From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2331BC32772 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AE13CA34D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:48:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B05C3C285E for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:47:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB12100047A for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:47:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910161F979; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:47:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1661269674; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Kg2T67DEazudxVQGZf+5mgrNlMmIaZYvjIbA9T/Hkl0=; b=ev6K+Do+HWR60355k/w8GmJnBz+g9QLvk45hBuAGXWClKUdjV2FfkkUenOx4uZCubg3Q72 /XTh7dCw5MK8TSrSRVj/MeqXyVytY968U1K1WcZvckQh0QM27dWvFLzb5hsXwjdz2MNpW7 Al5CPh9h2vTCQE2z3Pq3G3acmTsF9QA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1661269674; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Kg2T67DEazudxVQGZf+5mgrNlMmIaZYvjIbA9T/Hkl0=; b=gNMAFl7iRRI5mTdw8XNibUznDfSrsIEQs2v6FxAL1gSK5AQxcqm50DSDftvppIquPCiGhs MA0NmG0dOCALRyDA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5692513A89; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id RLZME6r2BGMYJQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:47:54 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:47:52 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls: Use anonymous .resource_files for docparse X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Martin Doucha , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > Hi! > > "execveat02": { > > - "resource_files": "resource_files", > > + "resource_files": [ > > + "TEST_APP" > > + ], > > => improvement => I'd merge this patch. > Agreed, can we merge this patch? Or is there a reason not to? I just merge it. > > NOTE: It'd be nice if even TEST_APP was changed to execveat_child, > > not sure what needs to be one for it. NOTE the definitions are mostly in C > > source: > > #define TEST_APP "execveat_child" > I guess that this point has been discussed in the > "metaparse: Replace macro also in arrays" > where we agreed that we will need a list of macros that should not be > expandened. Yes, I'll still plan to finish it, but first more urgent work must be done :). Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp