From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2941C54EE9 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19CC3CAAD5 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:48:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0CB3CAAD5 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:48:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8B86013B4 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:48:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C251FA03; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:48:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1663069712; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8U1d95qmkAllCW9pXffd032tn0bn4MY/KTo9aMIOzjA=; b=GuFmH7WM2FsrBDoe2qYiJfv0jr0NHfHesSGdWPvG38T8YtfMT4Udyq0cBcD76Qx24KPnf1 S0h8a4N/sGrBHNPXXglQTyDRskMhJcm+nBHOQ71zAK6PqbJaYI7RxLmuSmoJR0CM6uDyJ0 BIVqeWsEILsxk6OUOsMKneyDka8Q8Sc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1663069712; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8U1d95qmkAllCW9pXffd032tn0bn4MY/KTo9aMIOzjA=; b=n4eHJVW9ylgD8WxfXnnT70GrgZtsXEkbCVR+sMytEqd+9WkZaxf/czHv64ZK6sAk3/P4QS EOGaciWKvyOq9jDA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15E013AB5; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 0SPYLRBuIGNcbgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:48:32 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:50:28 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] September LTP release X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Palethorpe , LTP List , Martin Doucha , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Well, if more than three people are involved in the release work, > I think that the release workflow should be arranged in time order, > otherwise, we're easily going to fall into chaos. e.g. > > Assumption work starting from the second week of the release month: > > 1. Collecting the patch list for a new release, like this email does (Cyril) > > 2. Reviewing and merging the patch list of step1 (All maintainers, > LTP-users) > > 3. Pre-release widely testing, we need to explicitly post results in step1 > email (Petr, Li Wang) > > 4. Tiny fix according to pre-release testing result (All maintainers, users) > > 5. Writing release note (Cyril) > > 6. Uploading tarballs (Petr) > > 7. Announcement email of LTP release (Cyril) > > > Does this look useful? or anything else? Thanks a lot for writing this down. Agree on all points, lets get to work so that we actually manage to produce the release at the end of the month. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp