From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] open04: add EMFILE check
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:21:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YynMbU0LbFGMlgeP@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2c1m7H581fn0VDq0nsjV6DN=+NwtmAegm0_WEqT0OmgiA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi!
> >> > > I faintly remmeber a similar patch where we decided not to work around
> >> > > for a test harness leaking filedescriptors into testcases.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > This also should be a solution, I searched the mailing list and got a
> >> > patch[1].
> >> > Do you mean adding that close-on-exec flag when opening fd in harness?
> >>
> >> Yes, that way you can be sure that no file descriptors are leaked to the
> >> tests.
> >>
> >
> > Ok, should I send patch v2 like this below?
> >
> > Note: the automation test open04 got passed but I'm not sure
> > if this has a side effect on logs. But from my observation, some
> > tests (with old-API) log can't be collected anymore.
> >
>
> Seems we shouldn't fix by adding 'close-on-exec' flag simply,
> it brings more issues to some old-API tests, I'm still looking into
> the problems which look like caused by ltp-pan designed.
Sound strange, what is the problem here.
> So can we just merge the patch as the original?
Sounds sensible for the release, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 3:10 [LTP] [PATCH] open04: add EMFILE check Li Wang
2022-09-15 12:52 ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-15 14:21 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-16 1:36 ` Li Wang
2022-09-16 9:39 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-19 12:12 ` Li Wang
2022-09-20 5:53 ` Li Wang
2022-09-20 14:21 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2022-09-20 18:29 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YynMbU0LbFGMlgeP@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox