From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99140E77182 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC463E8901 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:09:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB78B3E7D06 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:08:45 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCA5142D428 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:08:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0E61F6E6; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:08:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733918923; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SqNX3hmDuY8IGlrx++1ldT+5gpRYdx8mQ4jCJ38mzRg=; b=lovTyUHw0ZP2dEeO3kZq9cBwYpXbMXnQGV8vhWmmuDJG2H208AH0JpxB7Q/5wzGIsRq8sg dOr9Br/7P8idN9tH/y/Iweu5E4R+6tCAL2b7gBpRUJUPUp+27tGHXX6+8nzCtfswathjCp wgnJwq6Wr35YY7eW8h/hYF7bY9KxK04= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733918923; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SqNX3hmDuY8IGlrx++1ldT+5gpRYdx8mQ4jCJ38mzRg=; b=Mbid0TwViZtUi6nJMzzFy/bhi+UEzqgHEzfF5pDvaimSuLVTGdFAzEb7h624GNlyMojJ3e bhqZNJqo1nLxs+BA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=lovTyUHw; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Mbid0TwV DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733918923; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SqNX3hmDuY8IGlrx++1ldT+5gpRYdx8mQ4jCJ38mzRg=; b=lovTyUHw0ZP2dEeO3kZq9cBwYpXbMXnQGV8vhWmmuDJG2H208AH0JpxB7Q/5wzGIsRq8sg dOr9Br/7P8idN9tH/y/Iweu5E4R+6tCAL2b7gBpRUJUPUp+27tGHXX6+8nzCtfswathjCp wgnJwq6Wr35YY7eW8h/hYF7bY9KxK04= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733918923; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SqNX3hmDuY8IGlrx++1ldT+5gpRYdx8mQ4jCJ38mzRg=; b=Mbid0TwViZtUi6nJMzzFy/bhi+UEzqgHEzfF5pDvaimSuLVTGdFAzEb7h624GNlyMojJ3e bhqZNJqo1nLxs+BA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5D11344A; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id OJSZDcuAWWc4fgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:08:43 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:08:59 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20241201093606.68993-1-zlang@kernel.org> <20241201093606.68993-2-zlang@kernel.org> <20241202144208.GB321427@pevik> <20241209055309.54x5ngu3nikr3tce@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> <20241209061416.GB180329@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241209061416.GB180329@pevik> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4E0E61F6E6 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] ioctl_ficlone02.c: set all_filesystems to zero X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Zorro Lang , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Well, "Testing only" in the help (-h) was added there to suggest it's for > testing/debugging LTP, not a production testing. But newer mind, I'll implement > Cyril's suggestion, real usage justify it. + I'll add LTP_FORCE_SINGLE_FS_TYPE. > > We could allow more filesystems, e.g. instead of running LTP few times with > different LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE value: e.g. > > for fs in ext4 xfs btrfs; do LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=fs ioctl_ficlone02; done > > we could introduce support for particular filesystems > LTP_FILESYSTEMS="ext4,xfs,btrfs" ioctl_ficlone02 That is stil not equivalent if you run it with a whole LTP. We would have to run each test that uses device for all LTP_FILESYSTEMS, since many of the testcases does use device but does not use .all_filesystems. So all in all I think that LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE is good enough solution. Or we can try to rething the whole thing, but it's getting quite complicated with all the options we have. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp