From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30FB0E77184 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF933ED466 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:26:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B4573ED454 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:25:52 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97EA10009FD for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:25:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39BF1F396; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:25:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1734618350; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZIiyhFngO+AEuf+mslon4OlWunySyVjuIk9LrEu8qAM=; b=o5UUVF6uX2icTKWzPevJdm/TdtccRQhsvFCCpceyRlsjRfcxl38X5iq5Ltn1NZ8M6J8U9X 5iykHWskN+cu8VpS6cEXneOhAJ/YW/F3Rl7BjTpzr4osvpZdH21f6Nqo80crOwKyVxAcAZ sm32Ko7hrZHivw8YkBRIHUL/SrK8ig0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1734618350; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZIiyhFngO+AEuf+mslon4OlWunySyVjuIk9LrEu8qAM=; b=D2sy/LZUU0nEuJDmjBJnJPvNrY/qVaGO52y0j3KbJzu6GpIQq/67DFRHE1FfMQ8AEx8E7S vU7L3cMX2EtxenDg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1734618350; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZIiyhFngO+AEuf+mslon4OlWunySyVjuIk9LrEu8qAM=; b=o5UUVF6uX2icTKWzPevJdm/TdtccRQhsvFCCpceyRlsjRfcxl38X5iq5Ltn1NZ8M6J8U9X 5iykHWskN+cu8VpS6cEXneOhAJ/YW/F3Rl7BjTpzr4osvpZdH21f6Nqo80crOwKyVxAcAZ sm32Ko7hrZHivw8YkBRIHUL/SrK8ig0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1734618350; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZIiyhFngO+AEuf+mslon4OlWunySyVjuIk9LrEu8qAM=; b=D2sy/LZUU0nEuJDmjBJnJPvNrY/qVaGO52y0j3KbJzu6GpIQq/67DFRHE1FfMQ8AEx8E7S vU7L3cMX2EtxenDg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C7113A77; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id UZG5Lu4sZGdbKAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:25:50 +0000 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:25:52 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20241218190029.15015-1-chrubis@suse.cz> <20241218190029.15015-9-chrubis@suse.cz> <20241219141656.GC115746@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241219141656.GC115746@pevik> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.30 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:email,yuki.lan:mid]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 8/9] metadata: metaparse: Add a few pre-defined macros X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > +/* pre-defined macros that makes the output cleaner. */ > > +static const struct macro { > > + char *from; > > + char *to; > > +} internal_macros[] = { > > + {"TST_CG_V2", "2"}, > > + {"TST_CG_V1", "1"}, > > + {"TST_KB", "1024"}, > > + {"TST_MB", "1048576"}, > > + {"TST_GB", "1073741824"}, > I guess we need a number for calculation (e.g. 1 * TST_GB) > Otherwise 1 GB would be more readable than a big number. The metadata are supposed to be read by a computer, so indeed the number is better. I guess that we can convert it to something more sensible in the perl script that generates the html pages. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp