From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70441C02181 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610613C196B for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:30:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCEB3C1845 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:30:16 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6D8600D47 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:30:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D808E1F7BD; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:30:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737376214; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DQn/aWUh7On4/Ytjws3iGBNqA2ELzNCHPj3arJmmbps=; b=a1/bY6kJl80fh/FQ9DO4FyzFDEoxdjskNiteAsOeLC1a1aYZF1i3Hgt2VhCU37+PHCOdyJ hYPWJo5I2HeX7swH+myQP+rzBYpfXXbNex3AXFolyxNQiOR/BboTxRVp87QvOVJTki3rsa /NEMxZm/uKJJo5xA0MKmfeAbupwtLQU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737376214; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DQn/aWUh7On4/Ytjws3iGBNqA2ELzNCHPj3arJmmbps=; b=CiJTa6yTB3lBu9Yp8xaXIJi799kevjggF9RUpsN5Tp6YmN3MLorlNx+zWvssDRqz7DwVgD HTl4/abwawcd/aDw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=ylUDAUwm; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=QcMiRNsV DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737376213; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DQn/aWUh7On4/Ytjws3iGBNqA2ELzNCHPj3arJmmbps=; b=ylUDAUwmAqBviAikkOXIDfS8TZXdElxjvqbMTNC3Yf2lVJHACrnClO/xc1iagxjcOJhVTK knGZJR4XOrtjPT3NzmgcWLAUgQ8tIJx1NuGcbV9bqQz+J6EBADsyfv2S1PGOgjafUWBWmk QAaHUtVwwgVifk//70hy1b0Y5lM1vlI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737376213; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DQn/aWUh7On4/Ytjws3iGBNqA2ELzNCHPj3arJmmbps=; b=QcMiRNsVTtrHRYG0gqouAxqE7FKfyjLCjfq9jfBlDPB9jEHFna7oVspsI1cFXw7Kshl5yK Dkmj5nEd3J7px8Cw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD81B139CB; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id kLloLdVBjmeWDAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:30:13 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:29:58 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20241222072251.13150-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20250115224154.GA664782@pevik> <20250120090740.GB794282@pevik> <20250120091137.GC794282@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D808E1F7BD X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25478, ipnet:::/0, country:RU]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [REGRESSION] pidns05 timeout (was: [PATCH 1/2] lib: multiply the timeout if detect slow kconfigs) X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Martin Doucha Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Yes, I understand your concern. I agree that we can avoid the > kconfig detection for most faster test cases. > > After reviewing my previous pre-release LTP test and compare to > the current main branch test, it doesn't show much more time-consuming, > maybe there is different HW/kernel factors, but the performance > impact can be ignored. I've just send a patch that caches the detection results, because in the case of pins05 we did parse the config for each SAFE_CLONE() call. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp