From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] tst_net.sh: Fix calling tst_brk with TFAIL
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:50:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4aH4LDbjgWDyLrW@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241217213245.29778-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
Hi!
> And yes, using shell runner to run netstress as a child would probably
> help, but logs would need to be printed immediately to be visible before
> calling tst_brk() from netstress.
> NOTE: Despite macro name TST_BRK_SUPPORTS_ONLY_TCONF_TBROK() the
> original concept in 0738e3753c allowed TFAIL as well.
>
> This patch adds simple build-check that allows only
> TFAIL, TBROK and TCONF as parameter for tst_brk().
>
> TFAIL is currently quite commonly used as a shortcut for
> TFAIL + exit() by many tests. I kept it for now, since
> it doesn't go against current doc description.
>
> And indeed C API allows tst_brk(TFAIL). Should we allow this also in
> shell API?
I think that it does make sense to have a reporting function that
reports a result and exits. The type of the result is really orthogonal
to the fact that the function does not return and both tst_brk(TFAIL,
...) and even tst_brk(TPASS, ...) do make sense.
The rules that we enforced on tst_brk() were mainly because of the
limits of the implementation details that should have been fixed in the
library instead.
> Also Cyril suggested for C API different approach:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20241115164101.17983-1-chrubis@suse.cz/
>
> Therefore we should probably agree what to do with C API and then unify shell API.
I suppose so.
> testcases/lib/tst_net.sh | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/lib/tst_net.sh b/testcases/lib/tst_net.sh
> index ee0ae1cad7..d44115d758 100644
> --- a/testcases/lib/tst_net.sh
> +++ b/testcases/lib/tst_net.sh
> @@ -713,9 +713,17 @@ tst_wait_ipv6_dad()
>
> tst_netload_brk()
> {
> + local res="$1"
> + local msg="$2"
> +
> tst_rhost_run -c "cat $TST_TMPDIR/netstress.log"
> cat tst_netload.log
> - tst_brk_ $1 $2
> +
> + if [ "$res" = TFAIL ]; then
> + tst_res_ "$res" "$msg"
> + else
> + tst_brk_ "$res" "$msg"
> + fi
> }
>
> # Run network load test, see 'netstress -h' for option description
> @@ -825,28 +833,31 @@ tst_netload()
> fi
>
> if [ "$ret" -ne 0 ]; then
> - [ $((ret & 32)) -ne 0 ] && \
> - tst_netload_brk TCONF "not supported configuration"
> + [ $((ret & 32)) -ne 0 ] && tst_netload_brk TCONF "not supported configuration"
>
> - [ $((ret & 3)) -ne 0 -a $was_failure -gt 0 ] && \
> + if [ $((ret & 3)) -ne 0 -a $was_failure -gt 0 ]; then
> tst_netload_brk TFAIL "expected '$expect_res' but ret: '$ret'"
> + return
> + fi
>
> tst_res_ TWARN "netstress failed, ret: $ret"
> was_failure=1
> continue
> fi
>
> - [ ! -f $rfile ] && \
> + if [ ! -f $rfile ]; then
> tst_netload_brk TFAIL "can't read $rfile"
> + return
> + fi
>
> results="$results $(cat $rfile)"
> passed=$((passed + 1))
> done
>
> if [ "$ret" -ne 0 ]; then
> - [ $((ret & 4)) -ne 0 ] && \
> - tst_res_ TWARN "netstress has warnings"
> + [ $((ret & 4)) -ne 0 ] && tst_res_ TWARN "netstress has warnings"
> tst_netload_brk TFAIL "expected '$expect_res' but ret: '$ret'"
> + return
> fi
>
> local median=$(tst_get_median $results)
As for this patch, wouldn't it make more sense to allow tst_brk_ TFAIL
instead, who knows how many places in shell stil use that...
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 21:32 [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] tst_net.sh: Fix calling tst_brk with TFAIL Petr Vorel
2025-01-14 15:50 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2025-01-14 16:16 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4aH4LDbjgWDyLrW@yuki.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox