From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E791C0015E for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D623CF0CF for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:05:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E442F3C99BA for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:05:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE9C1A00924 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:05:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7391F459; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:05:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1687878311; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kWiy0zX8Txg50YMmXQpyW6IUxB+jCUDKAT1jqIyutRY=; b=rGTsM5lqJiqpXLXkFCrAEoyUgQmitC+VROz704jeqXmZG+YoCaThmqxt5LyYiatDlEk01o PvASFgWfdwJNGdhBYkpLTShOUCAKUqPVok/DVL+9AEGynHCvRATSJnxbss7FWXAP8jJap8 CkPOOHKDRUBJ6Ryd6HrzNp3/1Gz740c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1687878311; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kWiy0zX8Txg50YMmXQpyW6IUxB+jCUDKAT1jqIyutRY=; b=PJKf2CFcSgw4VenZB7VBbGBKjwLYVA778meeTCi9QFsmEkdGC6iKielc+iekGgyRNSS1/x +zXDuG4Bzvnzc+Bg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640B213276; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id F5J4Faf6mmSfIAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:05:11 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:06:18 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20230615093933.3185297-1-dylan@andestech.com> <20230627135004.GA58180@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230627135004.GA58180@pevik> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] hugeshmctl02: Skipped EFAULT tests for libc variant X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: minachou@andestech.com, tim609@andestech.com, ltp@lists.linux.it, x5710999x@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > Okay, sounds reasonable. I agree with this. > > BTW I also get ENOMEM on my laptop (currently 1G free space): > hugeshmctl02.c:119: TBROK: shmget #1: ENOMEM (12) > > Should we handle it somehow? The line 119 looks suspicions, in latest git the hugeshmctl02.c does not even have 119 lines. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp