From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF97C001DF for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA1D3CB993 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:38:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580BC3C8B93 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:38:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B59F600C77 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:38:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF0522353; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:38:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1690281521; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KLww3t6tqvG4CdPkOKidfPq2XK8wM/iKEwx+6T4OhOY=; b=15VNj75AE7qTlAzHoC+ru8Xcv+y/1dSEOtKRVFQW7MTh1OPgZCg2yAjkvcf5DQRi/KTZEz rHqey1jFyU9fSuuAoha1xuC9ui7rgy+Qzf8i8biuyIhl43CDtJO1bG7nhAPM4hhmVG+mlb mer9WgR5Yfvxh3WuqvlM1axnh7DGB00= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1690281521; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KLww3t6tqvG4CdPkOKidfPq2XK8wM/iKEwx+6T4OhOY=; b=Dc+DbzcwZ8e3GSRjztQt11nlEXfVYg0Ox2qPiw5iq2tbk6RCd1flbfdYGU11kH3GvvSJHY YCHDz7q9JZbPPjCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D881D13342; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id rZFdMzGmv2RSAgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:38:41 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:39:43 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Avinesh Kumar Message-ID: References: <20230719113906.22317-1-akumar@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230719113906.22317-1-akumar@suse.de> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/pipe08: Remove the test X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > This test scenario of verifying SIGPIPE signal is being covered in > syscalls/write05.c test. Hmm, this one is actually hard to figure out. Indeed the write test implmenents the SIGPIPE case, however it would make more sense to have the SIGPIPE test in syscalls/pipe/ directory instead. I guess that any kernel developer that would like to use LTP for testing changes in pipe() implementation would rather want to have the test under pipe/ directory. Maybe we should keep the pipe08 test and remove the case from the write05 test instead? Or should we keep both? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp