From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82FFDC001DF for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 10:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2C53CDAFD for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF693CC888 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE301A0239F for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:59:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F981F37F; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:59:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1690970386; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hBx3ndg4hQriIn4NT7u25ZkthJot+sJh+D2Cn35Kx2Q=; b=AfD9zkx7n/7p1YlYdA4BPo2KPNxFcscf9QhEUd97WUGTNvGMPMI9ZlGowPemokhuN+o2PK Flp1XOAQFcHaD5WXevVMj4LUP0LLOzEvljERBRqKRBQeCaDOcZt+h0N5aMy5rKrKhenfV3 epY7xnj8ir5vMgi0If2YbT/gOmaSfzc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1690970386; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hBx3ndg4hQriIn4NT7u25ZkthJot+sJh+D2Cn35Kx2Q=; b=u25yBi+Kd1qEBnVEVOfmPunsJfixHhg6ZlB8s46Q24k5d03jYMi7Obc2Ct/VI4Jz0te/qT V/qfSAI3YTG3YBDQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE6613909; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id FW0OEhIpymRndgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:59:46 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 12:00:43 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Avinesh Kumar Message-ID: References: <20230719113906.22317-1-akumar@suse.de> <422745784.q2UjYaihZW@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <422745784.q2UjYaihZW@localhost> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/pipe08: Remove the test X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > Hmm, this one is actually hard to figure out. Indeed the write test > > implmenents the SIGPIPE case, however it would make more sense to have > > the SIGPIPE test in syscalls/pipe/ directory instead. I guess that any > > kernel developer that would like to use LTP for testing changes in > > pipe() implementation would rather want to have the test under pipe/ > > directory. > > > > Maybe we should keep the pipe08 test and remove the case from the > > write05 test instead? Or should we keep both? > > Thank you for your feedback. Now I too think we can keep both, but you guys > can decide. Please let me know, I can send the patch for pipe08 to convert to > new API if we decide to keep it. I would wote for converting the test into the new API. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp