From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1 1/2] Refactor getegid01 using new LTP API
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:21:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPHXMGNqT6WQUmyg@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ace7a77a-f187-45ed-91e5-c19b8d240a39@suse.com>
Hi!
> >> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(gid, st_egid);
> > So the code here should really do:
> >
> > if (GID16_CHECK(st_egid))
> > TST_EXP_EQ_LI(gid, st_egid);
> > else
> > tst_res(TPASS, "getgid() passed");
>
> Mmmh, this would make sense if GID16_CHECK only checked for 16bit
> compatibility, because at the moment it's way different:
>
>
> #define GID16_CHECK(gid, sys_name, cleanup) \
> if (!GID_SIZE_CHECK(gid)) { \
> tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, \
> "gid %d of %s is too large for testing 16-bit version " \
> "of %s()", gid, #gid, #sys_name); \
> }
>
> Am I missing something?
It seems that I confused GID16_CHECK with GID_SIZE_CHECK(), so it should
have been:
if (GID_SIZE_CHECK(st_egid))
> > Which skips the check on 16bit syscall in the case that the GID
> > overflows 16bit, however we still have to report at least single TPASS
> > otherwise the test will be failed by the test library.
> >
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void cleanup(void)
> >> -{
> >> -}
> >> +static struct tst_test test = {
> >> + .test_all = run,
> >> +};
> >> --
> >> 2.35.3
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
> Andrea
>
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-01 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-31 10:42 [LTP] [PATCH v1 0/2] Refactor getegid testing suite Andrea Cervesato
2023-08-31 10:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1 1/2] Refactor getegid01 using new LTP API Andrea Cervesato
2023-08-31 13:32 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-01 11:46 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2023-09-01 12:21 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2023-09-01 11:57 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2023-09-01 12:22 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-01 12:47 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2023-08-31 10:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1 2/2] Refactor getegid02 " Andrea Cervesato
2023-09-08 9:37 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-09-08 10:25 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPHXMGNqT6WQUmyg@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox