From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 4/4] syscalls/mmap04: Rewrite the test using new LTP API
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:28:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPHY1CtYogkqUHzQ@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2556714.ltBL1Nq8q0@localhost>
Hi!
> > This is nearly identical to the mmap02.c and the same comments apply
> > here.
> >
> > Also the test does not check the PROT_EXEC part at all. If we wanted to
> > properly test PROT_EXEC we would have to copy a function code to the
> > file first then execute it, something that mprotect04 does, but since
> > that flag is already tested in mprotect04 it does not make that much
> > sense to have it here as well.
>
> Yes, I agree this test does not cover PROT_EXEC scenario. So, if this case is
> covered in mprotect04, do you recommend dropping this test altogether from
> here?
Testing that the flag is accepted by mmap() and mmap succeeds is
actually enough of test, that validates that the flag parsing in
sys_mmap() function in kernel works fine.
One option how to make the test more interesting would be to:
1) create mappings with different PROT_* flags
2) parse /proc/self/maps and check that the flags match what is there
That way we would validate that all valid flag combination are parsed
fine and printed correctly in /proc/self/maps.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-01 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 11:20 [LTP] [PATCH 1/4] lib: Add SAFE_CALLOC() helper function to LTP library Avinesh Kumar
2023-08-18 11:20 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/4] syscalls/mmap01: Rewrite the test using new LTP API Avinesh Kumar
2023-08-29 8:59 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-08-18 11:20 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/4] syscalls/mmap02: " Avinesh Kumar
2023-08-29 9:07 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-08-18 11:20 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/4] syscalls/mmap04: " Avinesh Kumar
2023-08-29 10:03 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-01 12:13 ` Avinesh Kumar
2023-09-01 12:28 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2023-09-05 9:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/mmap04: Validate mapping perms in /proc/self/maps Avinesh Kumar
2023-09-14 15:14 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPHY1CtYogkqUHzQ@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=akumar@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox