From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C81CA0FE1 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E2B3CBD86 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DDB3CB66E for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:53:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCC5A601931 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:53:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D688521862; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:53:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1693572802; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7mRp39UPyi9gCLdYSkLGdKZAPoJl0E6DUFMYnrakoJg=; b=pJSZEE6ORu84NBslY/zc4d15k17jurQeEp3TnTGUMKmoEn8U7SBJIUDw5T7/40tdWUs8hX +cQT7alOFsfmwBKPNsKZLqCPUgCb1oeyITjo7MmwD4vl9loSEb7HLlnk5cxw2YU8mirq8H Jv3kbGBx+DB+KTwNY+4NYWR1lpBh1Kg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1693572802; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7mRp39UPyi9gCLdYSkLGdKZAPoJl0E6DUFMYnrakoJg=; b=6WHubaVXREpMWeKK8Wq2bTy/JbGiPJPndoa1F9FyaIc0VjrtR3W1WwyLGw7V2GIiiV2EJr 3LELZs7Cuam7WuAw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C00651358B; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id LtL6LMLe8WR+MAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 01 Sep 2023 12:53:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:53:58 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: References: <20230829073821.2580-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de> <20230901103758.GC323151@pevik> <20230901123126.GA343678@pevik> <7058a129-f1b8-4a52-a6b2-7c0fd6643dee@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7058a129-f1b8-4a52-a6b2-7c0fd6643dee@suse.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] Add process_madvise01 test X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > >> BTW I wonder if we should add 'vmstat' or 'cat /proc/meminfo' to ver_linux. > > cat /proc/meminfo sounds like a good idea. > > > Maybe do we need a flag in tst_test to check if swap is available or > not? Something similar to .min_mem_avail. Sounds reasonable to me, that way we would get the information propagated into metadata as well. Feel free to send a patch. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp