From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:46:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQ1iabFEs93OZMSE@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPIqsmTbJh7z-LcO@yuki>
* Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
> > Documentation/scheduller/sched-rt-group.rst [1] specifies this as values from -1 to
> > (INT_MAX - 1), I guess due int range. Looking into proc_dointvec_minmax() [2]
> > even INT_MAX would pass the check. I suppose we can do nothing about that,
> > because there is no value in sysctl_vals[] which would represent INT_MAX - 1.
> >
> > And you specify in LTP test range: from -1 to INT_MAX.
> >
> > But even much shorter value than INT_MAX fails:
> >
> > $ echo 1234567 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
> > sh: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>
> That is because runtime_us must be < period_us by definition, since
> runtime_us defines how much time is allocated from the period_us. I
> guess that this is not described good enough in the kernel docs.
Mind adding a second patch to your series, clarifying
Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 15:43 [LTP] [PATCH] sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Petr Vorel
2023-09-01 18:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-02 20:22 ` Petr Vorel
2023-09-22 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-09-22 11:43 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQ1iabFEs93OZMSE@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox