From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D35FE7E62E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1D03C042F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91CC13C042F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:16:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE491400E73 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF5E2183B; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:16:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1695730574; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sFbRsE1d3HZRtQ4ZhVPqnSCniCn5kLH52aladdIhXFk=; b=dAufS2ymJnoV0ROs2NhkTrgjobUfuA1mWwVFAaAl+pB9rQrNqizb6tVMuJOfvqg2xbJ1jc mIoBy8YXKB2vQexLCAvwAGbt2AihwyaMq2bcgozjaWM/CggRjVxQjR8wN0F4R2JKnYgfSi 90IWdkjwJw3I3+PsrFgsHaeo9FquUWc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1695730574; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sFbRsE1d3HZRtQ4ZhVPqnSCniCn5kLH52aladdIhXFk=; b=DeYmIVlXF8mBRyGw5h/siAbL/k0QZ9Io4qTxt5FHaT96kNm37hZognz8ATBpyPbhcLhSHY ZJNJ60yETYS862CQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA821390B; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id uArEGY7LEmWnDQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:16:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:16:57 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Jan Stancek Message-ID: References: <20230920095318.340582-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] Release scripts and docs X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Palethorpe , Xiao Yang , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > But I doubt that we really need the scripts to do release work > > automatically since we _only_ do the release every four months. > > It seems to bring additional maintenance work unnecessarily. > > > > I personally think the manual step is detailed enough for us. > > But anyway, now you have done the automation, I don't have > > an objection to your patch set, just feel that we automate for the > > sake of automation :). > > > > I'd like to hear more opinions, but if most of us think the script is > > necessary, I'm happy to accept them as well. > > As someone who hasn't done release before, I'd probably do it > manually first-time to double-check each step. > > It's probably not necessary, but people who did releases many times may > find it useful - I'm assuming the release procedure isn't changing > that frequently. I do have a similar script to tag git and release tarballs, doing that manually every time is really error prone, so it's good idea to include these in the repository. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp