From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A416C4167D for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD823CF3F3 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:34:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20EE83CC98D for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:34:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B151A02366 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:34:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3281FF05; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:34:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1698672858; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=omuyfOV7KTH5uFz31TpJV/dWKsK9X2+Qb3V4FxrYOGo=; b=D3b/eBHOtE0+ylgJUiQvgsBgUMOF/wRpr0dIgwhUB8t2MYZdDznhpp8qkhNgciyVSGZjIe g+qp18+BeU5gS6N2iykbe5f7Zd/sWOaxqn1lTggs5WVQh/JIJiugcdxlpsaz64cDNBBtjD 3SHy3JJ/4B5KCCsDXzFRJ2zZiCnbhhk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1698672858; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=omuyfOV7KTH5uFz31TpJV/dWKsK9X2+Qb3V4FxrYOGo=; b=0F7kaf+NNe1pUlkuO2u5YJkoPSPX3yWqLPMmLUzWlEzRQQaRRfS1g3VMaJG2T4/9OX07b7 6YNHAgbomtKU18Cw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76771138EF; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id /PE/HNqwP2VfHwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:34:18 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:34:48 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Richard Palethorpe Message-ID: References: <20230904111940.26824-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de> <878r8l2th7.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878r8l2th7.fsf@suse.de> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Refactor timer_getoverrun test using new LTP API X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Test looks fine apart from the issues I have with any test which fails > if a different error number is returned. I already started that > discussion here: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230901144433.2526-1-chrubis@suse.cz/#3191079 Since we have decided to solve this problem inside of the TST_EXP_FAIL() macro this shouldn't block this patch. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp