From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [CI FAILURE] Re: [PATCH v4] Add test for UI_GET_NAME ioctl
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:33:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTePTBOKBQDK0v24@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231024091052.GA219060@pevik>
Hi!
> > I've adjusted the FAIL/PASS messages and pushed, thanks.
>
> UI_GET_NAME() from include/uapi/linux/uinput.h is not on the old CentOS 7 we
> still support:
>
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/actions/runs/6614554688/job/17964785134
> /__w/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/input/input_helper.c:194:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'UI_GET_SYSNAME' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> SAFE_IOCTL(NULL, fd, UI_GET_SYSNAME(sizeof(sys_name)), sys_name, NULL);
> ^
>
> I'll have look later today for the fix. I suppose we need lapi/uinput.h with
> adds a fallback definition. It was added in kernel v3.15 in
> e3480a61fca7 ("Input: uinput - add UI_GET_SYSNAME ioctl to retrieve the sysfs path")
>
> Also, there is also an API version change, we could use this if simple ifndef
> UI_GET_SYSNAME + fallback will not be enough (e.g. test fails because it
> requires newer kernel API).
>
> -#define UINPUT_VERSION 3
> +#define UINPUT_VERSION 4
Given that UI_GET_SYSNAME is a macro we can do as well:
#ifndef UI_GET_SYSNAME
# define UI_GET_SYSNAME(len) ...
#endif
However at the same time we would need to actually check if the ioctl is
supported or not, because if the CentOS 7 kernel does not support
UI_GET_SYSNAME ioctl() the SAFE_IOCTL() will fail with EINVAL.
Also looking at the linux/uinput.h there are three more ioctls() added
in version 5 that should be tested as well. I suppose that we will need
add an issue for that.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 11:13 [LTP] [PATCH v1] Add test for UI_GET_NAME ioctl Wei Gao via ltp
2023-10-12 11:25 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-10-12 14:05 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-10-14 3:36 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-10-16 15:49 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-10-16 23:52 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-10-14 3:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-10-17 11:08 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-10-17 13:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-10-23 14:16 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-10-24 9:10 ` [LTP] [CI FAILURE] " Petr Vorel
2023-10-24 9:33 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTePTBOKBQDK0v24@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox