From: Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4] getcwd01: Use syscall directly check invalid argument
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 19:06:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZW0X8OkWwWKnr1x+@wegao> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231201101415.GB1710028@pevik>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> > Fixes: #1084
>
> > User space wrap getcwd with different implementation, for example
> > glibc will directly input parameter into kernel in normal situation
> > but uclibc-ng and musl will malloc buffer when buffer is NULL, so for
> > uclibc and musl the parameter size will be ignored. Use system call
> > directly check invalid argument can be a solution.
>
> For the sake of the correctness: there is no malloc() in musl [1] (nor in the
> mirror source you posted to #1084), that's only in uclibc-ng [2] and glibc [3].
>
> The reason why musl failed was already described by Richie and Cyril in #1084:
> musl ignores the size parameter when buffer is NULL and allocates it with PATH_MAX
> and passes this size to kernel.
>
> Therefore I reword the commit message.
>
> [1] https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/unistd/getcwd.c
> [2] https://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/tree/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/getcwd.c#n38
> [3] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/getcwd.c;h=5b0b6879ed28f278f07ce494f9be30f504757daa;hb=HEAD#l47
>
> ...
> > - tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "getcwd() failed as expected");
> > + TST_EXP_FAIL2(syscall(__NR_getcwd, tc->buf, tc->size), tc->exp_err);
> While syscalls() would work everywhere, it's better is LTP wrapper tst_syscall()
> (it TCONF in case when syscall is not implemented which is I admit nearly
> impossible).
>
> I used that and merged.
> Thank you!
>
> NOTE: we should implement .test_variants, where you just skip affected NULL
> buffer test (it's enough to test it with raw syscall). Please send a patch or
> let me know that you don't plan to do it and I'll do it.
I will try to send patch later.
Thanks you very much for fix my issue :) Will more carefull next time.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 1:08 [LTP] [PATCH v1] getcwd01: Only check buffer NULL on glibc Wei Gao via ltp
2023-09-28 7:06 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-09-28 8:44 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] getcwd01: Use syscall directly check invalid argument Wei Gao via ltp
2023-09-28 17:55 ` Petr Vorel
2023-09-29 0:49 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-09-29 0:45 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-11-28 10:52 ` Petr Vorel
2023-12-01 3:52 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-11-28 10:53 ` Petr Vorel
2023-12-01 3:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-12-01 10:14 ` Petr Vorel
2023-12-04 0:06 ` Wei Gao via ltp [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZW0X8OkWwWKnr1x+@wegao \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox