From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] ioctl_fiemap01: New test for fiemap ioctl()
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:23:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaVN90UDAhOKlCSP@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018054357.29035-1-wegao@suse.com>
Hi!
> +static void print_extens(struct fiemap *fiemap)
> +{
> +
> + tst_res(TINFO, "File extent count: %u", fiemap->fm_mapped_extents);
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < fiemap->fm_mapped_extents; ++i) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Extent %u: Logical offset: %llu, Physical offset: %llu, flags: %u, Length: %llu",
^
This would probably be better TDEBUG that has
been recently introduced.
> + i + 1,
> + fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_logical,
> + fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_physical,
> + fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_flags,
> + fiemap->fm_extents[i].fe_length);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_ioctl(void)
> +{
> + int fd;
> + struct fiemap *fiemap;
> +
> + fd = SAFE_OPEN(TESTFILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0644);
> +
> + fiemap = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(struct fiemap) + sizeof(struct fiemap_extent) * NUM_EXTENT);
> + fiemap->fm_start = 0;
> + fiemap->fm_length = ~0ULL;
> + fiemap->fm_extent_count = 1;
> +
> + fiemap->fm_flags = -1;
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap), EBADR);
> +
> + fiemap->fm_flags = 0;
> + SAFE_IOCTL(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap);
> + print_extens(fiemap);
> + if (fiemap->fm_mapped_extents == 0)
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Check fiemap iotct step1 pass");
This is missing the TFAIL branch, also "step1 pass" is not good enough
description of the test, we should really describe what we were testing
for.
> + SAFE_WRITE(SAFE_WRITE_ANY, fd, buf, getpagesize());
> + SAFE_IOCTL(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap);
> + print_extens(fiemap);
> + if ((fiemap->fm_mapped_extents == 1) && (fiemap->fm_extents[0].fe_physical == 0))
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Check fiemap iotct step2 pass");
Here as well.
> + fiemap->fm_flags = FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC;
> + SAFE_IOCTL(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap);
> + print_extens(fiemap);
> + if ((fiemap->fm_extent_count == 1) &&
> + (fiemap->fm_extents[0].fe_flags == FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) &&
> + (fiemap->fm_extents[0].fe_physical > 0) &&
> + (fiemap->fm_extents[0].fe_length == (__u64)getpagesize()))
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Check fiemap iotct step3 pass");
And here as well.
> + fiemap->fm_extent_count = NUM_EXTENT;
> + srand(time(NULL));
> + SAFE_LSEEK(fd, FILE_OFFSET, SEEK_SET);
> + SAFE_WRITE(SAFE_WRITE_ALL, fd, buf, getpagesize());
> + SAFE_IOCTL(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, fiemap);
> + print_extens(fiemap);
> + if ((fiemap->fm_extent_count == NUM_EXTENT) &&
> + (fiemap->fm_extents[NUM_EXTENT - 1].fe_flags == FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) &&
> + (fiemap->fm_extents[NUM_EXTENT - 1].fe_physical > 0) &&
> + (fiemap->fm_extents[NUM_EXTENT - 1].fe_length == (__u64)getpagesize()))
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Check fiemap iotct step4 pass");
And here as well.
> + free(fiemap);
> + close(fd);
SAFE_CLOSE() plase.
I suppose that we have to unlink the file so that the test work with -i
2.
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + buf = SAFE_MALLOC(getpagesize());
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + free(buf);
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .test_all = verify_ioctl,
> + .needs_root = 1,
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +};
> --
> 2.35.3
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-18 5:43 [LTP] [PATCH v1] ioctl_fiemap01: New test for fiemap ioctl() Wei Gao via ltp
2024-01-15 15:23 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2024-01-18 7:32 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2024-02-28 17:07 ` Petr Vorel
2024-03-29 8:28 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2024-03-29 21:32 ` Petr Vorel
2024-03-31 2:15 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2024-03-31 2:17 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Wei Gao via ltp
2024-04-03 9:28 ` Petr Vorel
2024-04-15 10:17 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2024-04-15 12:17 ` Petr Vorel
2024-04-15 11:46 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2024-11-06 10:34 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-12 8:50 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2024-12-12 8:50 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] tst_safe_macros.h: Add SAFE_STATVFS Wei Gao via ltp
2025-02-27 16:27 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-10 5:39 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2024-12-12 8:50 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 2/2] ioctl_fiemap01: New test for fiemap ioctl() Wei Gao via ltp
2025-02-27 16:43 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-10 5:31 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2025-04-10 5:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-04-10 5:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 1/2] tst_safe_macros.h: Add SAFE_STATVFS Wei Gao via ltp
2025-04-11 13:38 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-10 5:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 2/2] ioctl_fiemap01: New test for fiemap ioctl() Wei Gao via ltp
2025-04-11 15:40 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-04-15 1:39 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-04-15 1:39 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] tst_safe_macros.h: Add SAFE_STATVFS Wei Gao via ltp
2025-04-15 1:39 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 2/2] ioctl_fiemap01: New test for fiemap ioctl() Wei Gao via ltp
2025-04-14 16:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaVN90UDAhOKlCSP@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox