From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] Add stat04 test
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zb0c3WcA6PLSYCYl@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240118151547.12980-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de>
Hi!
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static void test_stat(void)
> +{
> + char *symname = "my_symlink0";
> +
> + TST_EXP_PASS(symlink(tst_get_tmpdir(), symname));
This one leaks memory from the tst_get_tmpdir() call, also I suppose
that the symlink can be created once in the test setup and removed once
in the test cleanup.
> + struct stat path_stat;
> + struct stat link_stat;
> +
> + SAFE_STAT(tst_get_tmpdir(), &path_stat);
Here as well, leak. I suppose that we can instead use "."
> + SAFE_STAT(symname, &link_stat);
> +
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_dev, link_stat.st_dev);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_mode, link_stat.st_mode);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_nlink, link_stat.st_nlink);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_uid, link_stat.st_uid);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_gid, link_stat.st_gid);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_size, link_stat.st_size);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_atime, link_stat.st_atime);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_mtime, link_stat.st_mtime);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(path_stat.st_ctime, link_stat.st_ctime);
> +
> + SAFE_UNLINK(symname);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_stat_no_path(void)
> +{
> + char *symname = "my_symlink1";
> + struct stat link_stat;
> +
> + TST_EXP_PASS(symlink("bc+eFhi!k", symname));
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(stat(symname, &link_stat), ENOENT);
> +
> + SAFE_UNLINK(symname);
> +}
This one should rather go into stat03.c
> +static void test_stat_loop(void)
> +{
> + char *symname = "my_symlink2";
> + struct stat link_stat;
> +
> + TST_EXP_PASS(symlink(symname, symname));
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(stat(symname, &link_stat), ELOOP);
> +
> + SAFE_UNLINK(symname);
> +}
This one is already tested in stat03.c
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> + test_stat();
> + test_stat_no_path();
> + test_stat_loop();
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = run,
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +};
> --
> 2.35.3
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 15:15 [LTP] [PATCH v1] Add stat04 test Andrea Cervesato
2024-02-02 16:48 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zb0c3WcA6PLSYCYl@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox