From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 508E1C54E67 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E913D0A1B for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6BC23D0860 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:01 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100F510085F6 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:50:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9EA1FB6F; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=Ahxv7uPn0yHUyjnSVGswZtpTD96N/M1Eq5D5oxrO5ZNIc5mCRwUV+uESmU/nnpRJCfJ4QM D/efYwLiIy+ILug7JgYGYHAap4jkfBrvbQu7BDat0RZC3Ewd7P3GLPFbgWyrfWkKtusRXj e6AkBS3oa4Wepby39OGTr/BFbC7Sxjo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=5q/3pwV4Nxs9UtGYE/cVhuZn7fFOdVV5nFHgAsTWRJrxUEnC5aqZaLP20X9Av2BuDSfSAp QF9M5g13ybobxfCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=Ahxv7uPn0yHUyjnSVGswZtpTD96N/M1Eq5D5oxrO5ZNIc5mCRwUV+uESmU/nnpRJCfJ4QM D/efYwLiIy+ILug7JgYGYHAap4jkfBrvbQu7BDat0RZC3Ewd7P3GLPFbgWyrfWkKtusRXj e6AkBS3oa4Wepby39OGTr/BFbC7Sxjo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=5q/3pwV4Nxs9UtGYE/cVhuZn7fFOdVV5nFHgAsTWRJrxUEnC5aqZaLP20X9Av2BuDSfSAp QF9M5g13ybobxfCg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0930913931; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GsQAARhg9GVGRgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:03 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Christian Brauner Message-ID: References: <202403151507.5540b773-oliver.sang@intel.com> <20240315-neufahrzeuge-kennt-317f2a903605@brauner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240315-neufahrzeuge-kennt-317f2a903605@brauner> Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=Ahxv7uPn; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="5q/3pwV4" X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.76 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.75)[84.05%] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2C9EA1FB6F X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [linus:master] [pidfd] cb12fd8e0d: ltp.readahead01.fail X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > So I'd just remove that test. It's meaningless for pseudo fses. Wouldn't it make more sense to actually return EINVAL instead of ignoring the request if readahead() is not implemented? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp