From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3564DC10F1A for ; Thu, 9 May 2024 09:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6905C3CE128 for ; Thu, 9 May 2024 11:44:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582803CDE83 for ; Thu, 9 May 2024 11:43:50 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAE41A00922 for ; Thu, 9 May 2024 11:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6685381DD; Thu, 9 May 2024 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1715247828; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QTOXprxaPvGPtZWa1SWEB9PeCSISmn+I7hcyWZogvxM=; b=P6NjHteubO2lBpJjdgWLsCElO0HVIxQ38rpPAXzZ8lTsOhRU/q5+qW4Gq/IHKsexIRiJMv JpadkBYa+fAQfY2OnWPvbYuLl5Ns6rRFOjm3pk2A6R6WcAb9911Z80VJ8Ts0yxO1oNV3hi zuesxGJmZ5E9yVyizyihZbRa1d2F7PM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1715247828; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QTOXprxaPvGPtZWa1SWEB9PeCSISmn+I7hcyWZogvxM=; b=zE7SizrjDOIIVt7IR086j9FxGyfyELfXGI0iLwXZ9KTR07n3hCr46nPdwZafITTV95KYga K1FffwzWPF63I+Bw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=P6NjHteu; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=zE7Sizrj DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1715247828; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QTOXprxaPvGPtZWa1SWEB9PeCSISmn+I7hcyWZogvxM=; b=P6NjHteubO2lBpJjdgWLsCElO0HVIxQ38rpPAXzZ8lTsOhRU/q5+qW4Gq/IHKsexIRiJMv JpadkBYa+fAQfY2OnWPvbYuLl5Ns6rRFOjm3pk2A6R6WcAb9911Z80VJ8Ts0yxO1oNV3hi zuesxGJmZ5E9yVyizyihZbRa1d2F7PM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1715247828; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QTOXprxaPvGPtZWa1SWEB9PeCSISmn+I7hcyWZogvxM=; b=zE7SizrjDOIIVt7IR086j9FxGyfyELfXGI0iLwXZ9KTR07n3hCr46nPdwZafITTV95KYga K1FffwzWPF63I+Bw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D0013941; Thu, 9 May 2024 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id xuUGJNSaPGbmMgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 09 May 2024 09:43:48 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 11:42:58 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20240130073507.662414-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240130073507.662414-2-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240130073507.662414-2-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A6685381DD X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.01 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] runtest: Move capability related tests to new capability X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Move cap_bounds content to syscalls > > runtest/cap_bounds and runtest/filecaps had both only single entry. > That's a waste of starting SUT, therefore create new runtest file > capability and move it there. Add there also runtest/securebits. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis > --- > Maybe it'd be safer to verify if the tests are still relevant now. > Because name is more promising than the actual content :). > Also we have other tests which use libcap. > Alternatively, we could just move them to syscalls. I would just merge them for now, since it's better than having one or two tests per file. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp