From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620ABC04FFE for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 15:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C383CFF1C for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 17:39:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8C533CFCD7 for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 17:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D991400070 for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 17:39:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D12420E27; Mon, 20 May 2024 15:39:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1716219550; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6sh4tYtfGbSqCtLO4F4rvqNJK2XdKIcYYs1mXd0GAaU=; b=YJyId0ceTthU7FghuT+9XfGSpu4WRp3phw6Us2yWbJU0v4cfYxDb+QOcnDsExESm0zmhiD OP5LYW9xlHu9wtT0wDAHTaFfTtEsdKp75KP4Tw58lC3Z0+J3U7sy+9670fHkCoesIQgFa6 YeHgoywHKJRyeLCZoI+btklp6zigM30= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1716219550; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6sh4tYtfGbSqCtLO4F4rvqNJK2XdKIcYYs1mXd0GAaU=; b=ffQMK30BLwmVLr5lLq2/36JlqwZl2CdzlTiw+k7Gj50tHn33I/3VOuPlShSUfbyeFzIq8h Llrbh4exhYO8kODA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=YJyId0ce; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=ffQMK30B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1716219550; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6sh4tYtfGbSqCtLO4F4rvqNJK2XdKIcYYs1mXd0GAaU=; b=YJyId0ceTthU7FghuT+9XfGSpu4WRp3phw6Us2yWbJU0v4cfYxDb+QOcnDsExESm0zmhiD OP5LYW9xlHu9wtT0wDAHTaFfTtEsdKp75KP4Tw58lC3Z0+J3U7sy+9670fHkCoesIQgFa6 YeHgoywHKJRyeLCZoI+btklp6zigM30= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1716219550; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6sh4tYtfGbSqCtLO4F4rvqNJK2XdKIcYYs1mXd0GAaU=; b=ffQMK30BLwmVLr5lLq2/36JlqwZl2CdzlTiw+k7Gj50tHn33I/3VOuPlShSUfbyeFzIq8h Llrbh4exhYO8kODA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD7D13A6B; Mon, 20 May 2024 15:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id NBKbHZ5uS2aNZAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 20 May 2024 15:39:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 17:38:17 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20240516005558.253199-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240516005558.253199-3-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240516005558.253199-3-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.77 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-2.76)[98.94%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.998]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8D12420E27 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] lib: Add .skip_in_32bit X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > @@ -494,6 +497,7 @@ struct tst_ulimit_val { > unsigned int skip_in_lockdown:1; > unsigned int skip_in_secureboot:1; > unsigned int skip_in_compat:1; > + unsigned int skip_in_32bit:1; I was thinking about this and maybe it would make more sense to make this more generic. If we ever need to add flags for a test to be skipped on 64bit ABI we would have to add another flag. One example would be an EOVERFLOW error from mmap() that can happen only on 32bit. So maybe it would make sense to change this to be .needs_abi_bits and the possible values would be 32 and 64. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp