From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6423AC2BD09 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4AC3D0F87 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:31:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AC43CD84E for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:31:37 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F421400196 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:31:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB86421A68; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:31:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1719232295; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1keOtDKRdp06YlsB+b1qYeFGxAQDRqIqDXH4EUB4xik=; b=EdVNdUk+uLInojMRq6qnekot0+/kaO7F1AdxqUG+LCxI9oq14mufoZH/jJ3fDffkKz7mlC impwPQrXu6i9jsy0FozJgZHyvYN2falDfn0wu9XAy2Y3y9tud6VnHp71Q9LG4n4K/7JZx6 15xbULQ9ZZS+5RbIAy9eRX5REPDVVNc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1719232295; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1keOtDKRdp06YlsB+b1qYeFGxAQDRqIqDXH4EUB4xik=; b=NgT7CiuHmUnKHkhBSFZi7wm5YDWGcOyrbdcFZQMjIDD8JvFY6l0w+WV/6b+WQ+q41GkQmp aT7MnAp8Vv6QASCw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1719232294; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1keOtDKRdp06YlsB+b1qYeFGxAQDRqIqDXH4EUB4xik=; b=HyE3BAZY0jSfgWGAZArHUlkqE4hGZgiQZt2AKsxrzD+dmpn1jqvyw02TgAkcp10kvKkgts gOclCn+Q17yGgWz+XTXhKzW3S7C3aFEIY8WW5YcHleE8s6L2doqe+21TKag6RtWAfAMzLw LLKBcLIFcj1A4ksUasi3Y71T+juglYU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1719232294; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1keOtDKRdp06YlsB+b1qYeFGxAQDRqIqDXH4EUB4xik=; b=lVkqsT8nELQQ9NpWh5D2MPRdQFWgMRC5MFjytiiMs1AsYK2SIgoPelVybf5ebnAHf9jsZW 8bp6+zrOY76rApCA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE571384C; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id A8XsJCZneWZrYgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:31:34 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:31:24 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20240419110230.191809-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.80 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:email] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] libs: Remove 'libltp' prefix from libs source directories X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > I know renaming files is not optimal. But history will be kept, when > > browsing with gitk or git gui. > > > > Improvement: less typing when cd to the directory. > > I do not have a strong opinion on this, feel free to push the change with my: Acked-by: Cyril Hrubis > +1 I agree with this, and I always have a question, why > we have additional libs/ parallel with lib/, is there any root > difference between them? or just a historical issue? The idea is exactly how it was described by Peter, these are usually libraries used only by a few tests e.g. functions to deal with swap or linux input, while lib/ has functions that are used by most of the tests with more generic functionalities. Apart from small speedup it makes things a bit easier to navigate, at least I think so. Or do you think that this would be better with all the files in a single directory? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp