From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: lufei <lufei@uniontech.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] acct01: add EFAULT errno check
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zoajv8Y1HEbjvhmh@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606065506.1686-1-lufei@uniontech.com>
Hi!
> 1. add EFAULT errno check.
> 2. fix make check errors and warnings.
Can you please split the functional changes and make chek fixes into
separate tests?
Ideally each type of change should be put into a separate patch.
> Signed-off-by: lufei <lufei@uniontech.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> index a05ed2ea9..ed1817bc5 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct01.c
> @@ -25,8 +25,7 @@
>
> #include "tst_test.h"
>
> -#define DIR_MODE (S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IXUSR|S_IRGRP| \
> - S_IXGRP|S_IROTH|S_IXOTH)
> +#define DIR_MODE 0755
> #define FILE_EISDIR "."
> #define FILE_EACCESS "/dev/null"
> #define FILE_ENOENT "/tmp/does/not/exist"
> @@ -34,6 +33,7 @@
> #define FILE_TMPFILE "./tmpfile"
> #define FILE_ELOOP "test_file_eloop1"
> #define FILE_EROFS "ro_mntpoint/file"
> +#define FILE_EFAULT "/tmp/invalid/file/name"
>
> static struct passwd *ltpuser;
>
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static char *file_eloop;
> static char *file_enametoolong;
> static char *file_erofs;
> static char *file_null;
> +static char *file_efault;
>
> static void setup_euid(void)
> {
> @@ -57,12 +58,22 @@ static void cleanup_euid(void)
> SAFE_SETEUID(0);
> }
>
> +static void setup_emem(void)
> +{
> + file_efault = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, 1, PROT_NONE,
> + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0, 0);
> +}
> +static void cleanup_emem(void)
> +{
> + SAFE_MUNMAP(file_efault, 1);
> +}
> +
> static struct test_case {
> char **filename;
> char *desc;
> int exp_errno;
> - void (*setupfunc) ();
> - void (*cleanfunc) ();
> + void (*setupfunc)();
> + void (*cleanfunc)();
> } tcases[] = {
> {&file_eisdir, FILE_EISDIR, EISDIR, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_eaccess, FILE_EACCESS, EACCES, NULL, NULL},
> @@ -73,16 +84,13 @@ static struct test_case {
> {&file_eloop, FILE_ELOOP, ELOOP, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_enametoolong, "aaaa...", ENAMETOOLONG, NULL, NULL},
> {&file_erofs, FILE_EROFS, EROFS, NULL, NULL},
> + {&file_efault, FILE_EFAULT, EFAULT, setup_emem, cleanup_emem},
^
This should actually describe the testcase so
it should be something as "Invalid address"
> };
>
> static void setup(void)
> {
> int fd;
>
> - TEST(acct(NULL));
> - if (TST_RET == -1 && TST_ERR == ENOSYS)
> - tst_brk(TCONF, "acct() system call isn't configured in kernel");
> -
> ltpuser = SAFE_GETPWNAM("nobody");
>
> fd = SAFE_CREAT(FILE_TMPFILE, 0777);
> @@ -113,7 +121,7 @@ static void verify_acct(unsigned int nr)
> tcase->setupfunc();
>
> TST_EXP_FAIL(acct(*tcase->filename), tcase->exp_errno,
> - "acct(%s)", tcase->desc);
> + "acct(%s)", tcase->desc);
>
> if (tcase->cleanfunc)
> tcase->cleanfunc();
> @@ -136,5 +144,8 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> {&file_enametoolong, .size = PATH_MAX+2},
> {&file_erofs, .str = FILE_EROFS},
> {}
> - }
> + },
> + .needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
> + "CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y",
> + },
> };
And this is a different change that is not described in the patch
description. So this patch should be actually split into three patches,
one that adds errno check, one that adds needs_kconfigs and one that
fixes make check errors.
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> index d3f3d9d04..74019f430 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void run(void)
>
> if (read_bytes != acct_size) {
> tst_res(TFAIL, "incomplete read %i bytes, expected %i",
> - read_bytes, acct_size);
> + read_bytes, acct_size);
> goto exit;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.3
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-04 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 6:55 [LTP] [PATCH] acct01: add EFAULT errno check lufei
2024-06-21 12:00 ` Petr Vorel
[not found] ` <20240624015245.54968-1-lufei@uniontech.com>
2024-06-24 1:52 ` lufei
2024-07-08 4:23 ` Petr Vorel
2024-07-08 5:31 ` 路斐
2024-07-08 8:54 ` Petr Vorel
2024-07-29 22:44 ` Petr Vorel
2024-06-24 1:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix make check errors: using .needs_kconfigs lufei
2024-07-04 13:29 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2024-07-05 2:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH] acct01: add EFAULT errno check 路斐
2024-07-08 8:56 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zoajv8Y1HEbjvhmh@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=lufei@uniontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox