From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AFE9C3DA49 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FD63D1C9D for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:18:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36A73D0F94 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:17:52 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE371A011C1 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:17:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF781F7FA; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:17:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1721920670; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L/3A6S+67pkd+wduv+fD4Zk8Xke3xAe8fGicKZA0Bao=; b=H+nPmQSbIn0bsaS6j5DHPLqr6fwG6lRyRosbMNJXJxUgFymN7J8uXWQ0O2zpZXL6d+JFvi 7GtwLf+Lea5JSFF55MpS74zNd0XhCPnq3vsNZxKFHyCSvvGBs0qgyEwGTTu0g2BoYWRzYr +Nhn7Pz74/f/vORZnWBreqAGk8uT2kY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1721920670; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L/3A6S+67pkd+wduv+fD4Zk8Xke3xAe8fGicKZA0Bao=; b=4Q247MXHqry1olNedKAxA1XltG60X7/f34q7r6QMtvdzuk831q1gWEAFXB4iJL6BwisVZf 8JLiUY2hYy779xCw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1721920669; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L/3A6S+67pkd+wduv+fD4Zk8Xke3xAe8fGicKZA0Bao=; b=BF3kPHPVNyQbg//3aSRAojuGK/qUK8e4ZbRHzGQ/gE53oEyyqr8D9cW3cZZcXxOiN9IMUQ +bOB+BJ49iqH9OlGawHeTdVYF6sKkCJMnd60V9c80gJWLKmWfIBfMFJJDZq++zSyYHa94z GZ8W+PC8MWGcXkWFuXCEmf5Df9faHII= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1721920669; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L/3A6S+67pkd+wduv+fD4Zk8Xke3xAe8fGicKZA0Bao=; b=NXbCwJQyTfjdJ7rOw7PV+ZHdc582J5NCYrpER4je8sSQUNIg4G+TD9jMLFGEpx5LG1mN6q 1L45F9YwgGQcxWBw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C395C13874; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id qU6uLp1sombcJQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:17:49 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:17:24 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20240723-ioctl_ficlone-v2-0-33075bbc117f@suse.com> <20240723-ioctl_ficlone-v2-1-33075bbc117f@suse.com> <20240725125516.GA987417@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240725125516.GA987417@pevik> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:email] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/7] Add fallback definitions for lapi/fs.h X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > However, if we want LTP could be built with all the middle glibc versions > > (2.22 < glibc < 2.36) > > this might be thinking over. Because we announce support the minimal > > glibc-version is 2.22. > > Hm, it makes sense to keep it. But nobody will remember once we raise the > support. Maybe we should at least add a comment glibc-2.22 workaround or something that could be found with grep. > Also, removing HAVE_LINUX_FS_H [1] works in the CI [2], including distros with > glibc 2.36 (minimal build [3] or all cross-compile builds, e.g. [4]). > > I wonder how realistic is that somebody is still affected by this issue. That's a good question but I'm afraid the only way to find out is to remove the workaround and wait for people complain that the next LTP release is broken... -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp