From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB875CA1002 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8573CD434 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64A3F3CD3E9 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9564F6007AE for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:07:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357A0343CA; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:07:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1756980455; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OtY3+5iC2yLf8AeJID5Pahd2H4DYU9oikKUZHw4/ADQ=; b=mWjFvDIRRJB/YyipWd0MhcemRMOD8GDKgY3bo+gXCLyyv/d+YpUr1YL21dGC5hrylX2xUi Rj/Eoxm37XF25+xaNnhzcyrpM+PK5ypT38HRMT7yVro06ufj46WbvfD5u4ATrR2oqiubrs r1oi9Uw+ILTUmbzL1ah7GdBH/JnvPe4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1756980455; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OtY3+5iC2yLf8AeJID5Pahd2H4DYU9oikKUZHw4/ADQ=; b=KXGVU/NuDTF+VMLYfL0H61EpLbjc/JMrX6ZT7xLW+3XVhbrlL1N8NnwY6jPT8vyCG7H5zH IA6ukf922qRVYICA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=mWjFvDIR; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="KXGVU/Nu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1756980455; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OtY3+5iC2yLf8AeJID5Pahd2H4DYU9oikKUZHw4/ADQ=; b=mWjFvDIRRJB/YyipWd0MhcemRMOD8GDKgY3bo+gXCLyyv/d+YpUr1YL21dGC5hrylX2xUi Rj/Eoxm37XF25+xaNnhzcyrpM+PK5ypT38HRMT7yVro06ufj46WbvfD5u4ATrR2oqiubrs r1oi9Uw+ILTUmbzL1ah7GdBH/JnvPe4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1756980455; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OtY3+5iC2yLf8AeJID5Pahd2H4DYU9oikKUZHw4/ADQ=; b=KXGVU/NuDTF+VMLYfL0H61EpLbjc/JMrX6ZT7xLW+3XVhbrlL1N8NnwY6jPT8vyCG7H5zH IA6ukf922qRVYICA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FAED13AA0; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id esdABudkuWgoKAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:07:35 +0000 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:08:08 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20250904064126.125661-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20250904094842.GA52619@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:email,suse.cz:dkim,yuki.lan:mid,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received,2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 357A0343CA X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sched_football: synchronize with kickoff flag to reduce skew X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > No Cyril wasn't wrong. The realtime schedulling priorities in kernel are > > completely different thing from realtime kernel patchset. > > > > Yes, we can set up processes with SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR policies > on the stock kernel, but it's not the same thing as the PREEMPT_RT kernel. Honestly it is, the difference with PREEMT_RT is that the scheduller is more aggressive, which probably explains why things settle down into a steady state faster after the barrier. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp