From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4C4CAC5A5 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1FB3CDF4B for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:16:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77EF73CDC15 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:15:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97BF1A0090E for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5995C78F; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:15:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1758719749; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mz8Tmu1svlZeLJk1lv6su4I48dDJrtsIAQjMN1O60Zc=; b=caC0YuF8m40jfqII5EDIh2tCsL0E9HVHRV4PFEU10avFGco/F4uSPHpfcKqz4MloleHMHa R34DubVmRijvDYpVHeBglq/SnmwgNDNb4EDipJrGL7c6BbvRjAD9nuaSZOlbDSb88vyS6r 7lnlCsFLZYnHTrnj3yyu7ffQLDab95I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1758719749; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mz8Tmu1svlZeLJk1lv6su4I48dDJrtsIAQjMN1O60Zc=; b=VauGMyFLsf1nyBoY3W0ntTsJ9FxQ1rWKWX7/wqrxNmRoOcRllqVgFRy5svFprl0aCoMucn xO481vFq6ae8XZCQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=caC0YuF8; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=VauGMyFL DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1758719749; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mz8Tmu1svlZeLJk1lv6su4I48dDJrtsIAQjMN1O60Zc=; b=caC0YuF8m40jfqII5EDIh2tCsL0E9HVHRV4PFEU10avFGco/F4uSPHpfcKqz4MloleHMHa R34DubVmRijvDYpVHeBglq/SnmwgNDNb4EDipJrGL7c6BbvRjAD9nuaSZOlbDSb88vyS6r 7lnlCsFLZYnHTrnj3yyu7ffQLDab95I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1758719749; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mz8Tmu1svlZeLJk1lv6su4I48dDJrtsIAQjMN1O60Zc=; b=VauGMyFLsf1nyBoY3W0ntTsJ9FxQ1rWKWX7/wqrxNmRoOcRllqVgFRy5svFprl0aCoMucn xO481vFq6ae8XZCQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E38B13A61; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 7dh8IQXv02gKZAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:15:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:16:34 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: References: <20250923154827.74305-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> <1c7404a7-87aa-4c1f-a8f5-08fab2c69fea@suse.cz> <48487e51-0e3d-4dcd-b25f-2dc9dba74172@suse.cz> <44c9d5e1-c190-43f1-a600-97d3bddf2b6d@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44c9d5e1-c190-43f1-a600-97d3bddf2b6d@suse.cz> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns, suse.cz:email, suse.cz:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9F5995C78F X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] epoll_pwait06: Skip BPF map file descriptor X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Sure, we can add another test for epoll_ctl() later. I wrote > epoll_pwait06 because I actually ran into the timeout regression while > playing a game at home. I decided to loop over multiple file descriptor > types because it's simple enough and provides better coverage for edge > cases. > > Now, should I resubmit with that EPERM check or is the one-line fix good > enough as is? Let's go with that for the release as long as you promise to add more tests later. For the original patch: Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp