From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBB76CCA471 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 09:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B0A3CE051 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 11:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E5A73C5695 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 11:07:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E51E6002D7 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 11:07:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFF033761; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 09:07:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1759741667; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yTb1R4CJhNX3N+vkgzzFyDnNDVibCWcqPM0im01GGLc=; b=dq3QwuydyQeyB/BPhStGXzxJ+FNEITdA8ZdssdIyxkPyUysGXrWveXS/LU6zvrxO9XQJQi S4XxNrnlk1QQo3XxZWc6ThK+q0kxQADNxuAi1DHDjVuWt+9C8GeZhYGWJ25qMmNDgaJHjD jQkEQLGZanr7B+GzlwGt1p8qkCcdydo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1759741667; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yTb1R4CJhNX3N+vkgzzFyDnNDVibCWcqPM0im01GGLc=; b=KzqEgfJCnxPwc8D9+YYiVwDz6jjkQmAmtDdRpfRIcokkdgmmIY8xE2iwEE7YZ5LJcISeV2 iLj1mEp/zO2t3aAg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=UIFPrz1b; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=w6hSPKW7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1759741665; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yTb1R4CJhNX3N+vkgzzFyDnNDVibCWcqPM0im01GGLc=; b=UIFPrz1bTIT2KV9iGKZvXWbCNdi6c2PHlavDoBhxJ0UdBppSr14I7HEVR5mCAUMn7LLoO/ xxyEvOePYd7m+zSjO4QHOrEhsTW4EoNVSyWDFefjbsTVrqzqlJplI0zn/NGEQNN5BhBE/m szPA1AiuoRwZwyAaMakgDNXFLgPTsm8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1759741665; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yTb1R4CJhNX3N+vkgzzFyDnNDVibCWcqPM0im01GGLc=; b=w6hSPKW7ORqL/uwyggiV/nFGi50xKce2dHRPcCKKrpRnMnowiVvUUjXdrQRuZB8Eda8GOa mDgsfKCrvqPmhRCA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8FF213995; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 09:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id uqgDM+GG42jxOAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:07:45 +0000 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 11:08:35 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Avinesh Kumar Message-ID: References: <20251003101310.13359-1-akumar@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[yuki.lan:mid,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,suse.cz:email,suse.cz:dkim]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EBFF033761 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] openposix: update invalid clock id to accomodate new auxiliary clock ids X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Technically you can have any number of clocks defined by a system that > implements POSIX. So the comment here should be: > > "hopefully big enough not to be a valid clock value" > > And we may possibly bump it to a larger value as well, e.g. 50 Or we may be a bit smarter, for clock_gettime() or clock_getres() we can loop starting at 0 until we get EINVAL or cross sufficiently large value. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp