From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2088CAC5BB for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EDB3CE722 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 12:25:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F713CD942 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 12:25:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A241A009A4 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 12:25:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF81F33682; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:25:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1759919128; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g6iOZ4dDfw28CQQ2wOnFVgLWeBCqkmE/KeE5sCMvG/k=; b=I1cwcnN4czhCnHJilpZxH8NcLkiLXFpSk66radOcheU6aqMbwKkf27/gguAk6rPHkCd6yi n5arVqF9g7Rurh+m+s7XBcksEze9rDrmvOxj5ZLUrjhtdty1sI1bGKn5NWgC+aR8qN6TSJ /MUPFsVmpMx9MrE960z3cSsvZgIK0kU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1759919128; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g6iOZ4dDfw28CQQ2wOnFVgLWeBCqkmE/KeE5sCMvG/k=; b=KC34J486YHNcoDLR5OTaQyvLsL2pL80q1gtpnvamuOQeFcdvU6I7MC4egQZ8h49kUhDytB XQ0UYwfWlTmI3WCA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1759919125; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g6iOZ4dDfw28CQQ2wOnFVgLWeBCqkmE/KeE5sCMvG/k=; b=Pd2MpxMyaZWibUfcL/HdvjRhmT5/rBo/6VWxtmQx3zxI6bZw/gfDtMxUrlKP/xvegkIw4d tuHU3s3I2edK8txBw/DvL2zEUK9wD4SaInKUkV1qA9sdsEtkIIzMv0QnNSAWZ39fcP3S3W iUMKTGdVPfxBSfGvm7gBQNsdYu8hiJc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1759919125; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g6iOZ4dDfw28CQQ2wOnFVgLWeBCqkmE/KeE5sCMvG/k=; b=QsUV4t8D2rwhd6d20gwSSxfrOvdg5HIUVKGbRwUgh2IJB24ip6W/7WAWUFroeMkEz8dF+R I98MdCh6dEub/kAw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D652013A3D; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id fzpeMxU85mixEwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 08 Oct 2025 10:25:25 +0000 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 12:26:16 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20251007160516.145121-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251007160516.145121-1-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.30 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, yuki.lan:mid, suse.cz:email, gnu.org:url] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/1] fs: Remove acl/tacl_xattr.sh X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Old script which is not using LTP API, not in any runtest file. > > It tests acl (getfacl, setfacl) and attr (getfattr, setfattr) tools, but > both project have their own tests [1] [2]. LTP concentrates on kernel > part of testing nowadays, therefore remove it. Script is very simple > that it does not have any benefit for upstream. > > [1] https://cgit.git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/acl.git/tree/test > [2] https://cgit.git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/attr.git/tree/test While I agree that this is testing an userspace tools we do not have much acl coverate in LTP, there seems to be some network nfsv4 tests but that seems to be all. I guess that we should at least create an github issue that we should write a few tests for that. I guess that writing a simple test that sets up right extended attributes and expecte a file to be accessible or not shouldn't be that hard. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp