From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F36D65521 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B613D03B0 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:38:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E20A3CEB38 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:38:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27996007B9 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:38:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B795BCEC; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:38:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1765964304; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZtdJcQQlW58KOyZKM3SDGRGkPNtqZseFcgCSy6/23Zs=; b=vIuI6Xlz49ukUlkE6Xm9UcFkjhadxcIRD1vrYwKErj1p9sb45ka+vokk/7Y/+eGuh7bWiZ c0HvmIXGjH1UqNCoXlR5H0XMZF0uIhNaXSSf2rbeOmuWGCezvaPqTot4/jDv36tPT0ilfQ oQ5zXi+aA4j/I9buAMINnQQz8IjTXJw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1765964304; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZtdJcQQlW58KOyZKM3SDGRGkPNtqZseFcgCSy6/23Zs=; b=6B8jXBrjZsFb4Snyz4MVU1a71IDJtZZFosCC6gOA8SXyahkapawK54LMV6qtyZncyVWu6G 9FGlnqTX+skCvkDw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=B0YYfHYS; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=1RzC9mKH DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1765964303; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZtdJcQQlW58KOyZKM3SDGRGkPNtqZseFcgCSy6/23Zs=; b=B0YYfHYSBuMYH5JcFb/nHARmJd6LZF0T5XV74LXmoyE3riz0u2HV9uFIQEJna2X4SkXGPW KX4PQbfSVl/zVZO5HGOrrP9g2uHVyjZO5Klp3ZzDAzPCNcTa0iStpwIwZWnzU32EFUC6Kp aWUQ88zmOLNUJLv6RkosqH9DQtbiORU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1765964303; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZtdJcQQlW58KOyZKM3SDGRGkPNtqZseFcgCSy6/23Zs=; b=1RzC9mKHPUpAUJUeGpVDjShAPP3rFMX/HJB9defdIAkvkUv+XqialdgQfrl8kP35XQ4Awx cAHPPE9ORqENB1CA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906953EA63; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id KYM6Ig96QmlKdgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:38:23 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:39:26 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: References: <20251216173053.29112-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20251216173053.29112-2-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20251217070831.GA34230@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[yuki.lan:mid,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A1B795BCEC X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] cpuset_memory: Fix race in multinode subtests X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > I wonder if this very old test is in a long run worth to rewrite into C, as depending on > > sleep is not a good idea and C API would hopefully help to avoid it. (Yeah, we > > discuss sleep as a part of ground rules [1].) > > I tried, and I gave up :-) too many testcases and a really messy code. I > really wish we could rewrite it, but this is one of those tests which is > not worth the effort. We will have to rewrite it eventually, it's not that complex, just big. I guess that we need to isolate and rewrite one test after another while putting the common code into a library. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp