From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8979E9A048 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220F13D073F for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:15:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 902EE3C26C6 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:15:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0478C10007E3 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:15:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 237515BCC2; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:15:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1771506904; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y1hkiWb61sX8imBKRSpIMRjYCmI/YzHC8MTg5n/XlUI=; b=R+i/XPQ8BNp5qvIy9wYH4AVYFQHh5sUBuSoMJT706mlTs28Tcknhe+UhBPDhmykfJ75PR8 JHfN58NUmCZkZ1Tp2ggCsntDdy7iuxFGTGAE10bpCn9qu+c8c2tOZ7mrO+0XLcv99aryhL /j623bFxvpJR5I1UbK4uznFVLqFX6dg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1771506904; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y1hkiWb61sX8imBKRSpIMRjYCmI/YzHC8MTg5n/XlUI=; b=iFtodyStbyP/gRO2fD7wiz8WD37js49nIIgjV5lbjxnUGY/NC+REVhLHxuHPf6XqeUfWhx LzXymZ9kujXvJtCg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="R+i/XPQ8"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=iFtodySt DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1771506904; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y1hkiWb61sX8imBKRSpIMRjYCmI/YzHC8MTg5n/XlUI=; b=R+i/XPQ8BNp5qvIy9wYH4AVYFQHh5sUBuSoMJT706mlTs28Tcknhe+UhBPDhmykfJ75PR8 JHfN58NUmCZkZ1Tp2ggCsntDdy7iuxFGTGAE10bpCn9qu+c8c2tOZ7mrO+0XLcv99aryhL /j623bFxvpJR5I1UbK4uznFVLqFX6dg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1771506904; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y1hkiWb61sX8imBKRSpIMRjYCmI/YzHC8MTg5n/XlUI=; b=iFtodyStbyP/gRO2fD7wiz8WD37js49nIIgjV5lbjxnUGY/NC+REVhLHxuHPf6XqeUfWhx LzXymZ9kujXvJtCg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093D63EA65; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id rzIZAdgMl2mhIQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:15:04 +0000 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:15:05 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: References: <20260218135026.159676-1-rbranco@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from,2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email,yuki.lan:mid,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 237515BCC2 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] userfaultfd: Add test using UFFDIO_POISON X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > This one is wrong, volatile is correct for variables changed for syscall > > handlers. > > If this is wrong, we should verify checkpatch.pl configuration. It's only correct in very special situations such as signal handlers. I do not think that we can catch that with checkpatch. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp