public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Wang via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: Sebastian Chlad <schlad@suse.de>,
	ltp@lists.linux.it, Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP old API conversion
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:36:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abo5wgYIYzo9_yo0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317223920.GA370623@pevik>

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 11:39:20PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Petr,
> 
> > > I'd vote for limiting patchsets to max tests in a single directory.
> > > Why? Smaller patchset is easier to review. And if just some of the commits are
> > > accepted then fewer commits need to be rebased.
> 
> > Do you mean one patch-set for multiple (unrelated) tests (for instance syscalls
> > folder) [1], or one patch-set per testing suite [2] ?
> 
> I meant [2], i.e. tests from certain folder (usually tests related to single syscall).
> But it's just a suggestion, feel free to do it differently if it's significantly
> simpler.

Some tests may relocate their folder after the refacoring.

Regardless of which method we ultimately adopt, I recommend that
the AI send no more than 10 patches per week [1].

Furthermore, new patches should be sent only after the previous
patchset has been fully processed.

[1] Given that the total number of legacy tests is only 242,
the cleanup work will not take much time.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17 10:42 [LTP] LTP old API conversion Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-17 11:58 ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-17 12:14   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-17 22:39     ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-18  5:36       ` Li Wang via ltp [this message]
2026-03-17 15:32 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-03-17 15:49   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-18 13:04     ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-18  5:18   ` Li Wang via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abo5wgYIYzo9_yo0@redhat.com \
    --to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.doucha@suse.com \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=schlad@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox