From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Martin Cermak <mcermak@redhat.com>
Cc: valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [Valgrind-developers] [RFC PATCH 1/1] LTP tests: Run without LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT=1
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 10:57:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acOxlitfqdMfAbZs@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325094215.aiv3he5pdgm2v4fn@lida.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Hi!
> > > That sounds reasonable to me. Which one would you prefer to
> > > keep? I'm inclined to suggest keeping LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT
> > > and dropping LTP_QUIET but no really strong preference on my
> > > side. Thoughts?
> >
> > Maybe we can finally implement proper debug levels in LTP. E.g. hide
> > TINFO and TWARN messages with debug level 0 and default to debug level
> > 1. With debug level 2 we would show TDEBUG as well and with debug level
> > 3 we would show TDEBUG messages for library too.
>
> That would require running valgrind tests with something like
> debug level -1 ;) because what LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT actually
> does is that it hides testrun specific output like e.g. testrun
> specific addresses, temporary file names etc.
The LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT would have to stay, but the LTP_QUITE would
have been replaced by different debug levels.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 21:08 [LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/1] LTP tests: Run without LTP_REPRODUCIBLE_OUTPUT=1 Petr Vorel
2026-03-24 13:18 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-03-24 14:09 ` [LTP] [Valgrind-developers] " Martin Cermak via ltp
2026-03-25 9:06 ` Martin Cermak via ltp
2026-03-25 9:10 ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-25 9:21 ` Martin Cermak via ltp
2026-03-25 9:37 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-03-25 9:42 ` Martin Cermak via ltp
2026-03-25 9:57 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2026-03-25 10:01 ` Martin Cermak via ltp
2026-03-25 13:57 ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-25 14:52 ` Martin Cermak via ltp
2026-03-26 16:42 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acOxlitfqdMfAbZs@yuki.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mcermak@redhat.com \
--cc=valgrind-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox