From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v7] io_submit04: Add test case for RWF_NOWAIT flag
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:11:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adZot378W4Rg-g4V@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260404011340.13288-1-wegao@suse.com>
Hi!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_submit/io_submit04.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2025 Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * Test RWF_NOWAIT support in io_submit(), verifying that an
> + * asynchronous read operation on a blocking resource (empty pipe)
> + * will cause -EAGAIN. This is done by checking that io_getevents()
> + * :manpage:`io_getevents(2)` syscall returns immediately and
> + * io_event.res is equal to -EAGAIN.
> + */
> +
> +#include "config.h"
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
> +#include "lapi/aio_abi.h"
> +
> +#define BUF_SIZE 100
> +
> +static int fd[2] = {-1, -1};
> +static aio_context_t ctx;
> +static char *buf;
> +static iocb *cb;
> +static iocb **iocbs;
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + if (tst_syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx))
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "io_setup failed");
Sorry if that was asked in previous reviews. Why are we using
tst_syscall() instead of the libaio functions like we do in the rest of
the tests?
> + SAFE_PIPE(fd);
> +
> + cb->aio_fildes = fd[0];
> + cb->aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_PREAD;
> + cb->aio_buf = TST_PTR_TO_UINT(buf);
> + cb->aio_offset = 0;
> + cb->aio_nbytes = BUF_SIZE;
> + cb->aio_rw_flags = RWF_NOWAIT;
> +
> + iocbs[0] = cb;
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + if (fd[0] != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd[0]);
> +
> + if (fd[1] != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd[1]);
> +
> + if (ctx && tst_syscall(__NR_io_destroy, ctx))
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "io_destroy() failed");
> +}
> +
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> + struct io_event evbuf;
> + struct timespec timeout = { .tv_sec = 1 };
> + long nr = 1;
> +
> + TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, nr, iocbs));
> +
> + if (TST_RET == -1 && TST_ERR == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> + tst_brk(TCONF, "RWF_NOWAIT not supported by kernel");
> + } else if (TST_RET != nr) {
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "io_submit() returns %ld, expected %ld",
> + TST_RET, nr);
> + }
> +
> + TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_io_getevents, ctx, 1, 1, &evbuf, &timeout));
> +
> + if (TST_RET != 1) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "io_getevents() failed to get 1 event");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (evbuf.res == -EAGAIN)
> + tst_res(TPASS, "io_getevents() returned EAGAIN on read event");
> + else
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "io_getevents() returned with %s instead of EAGAIN",
> + strerror(-evbuf.res));
^
tst_strerrno()
Other than these two minor issues I do not see any problems in the code,
the rest looks fine.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-29 1:27 [LTP] [PATCH v1] io_submit04: Add test case for RWF_NOWAIT flag Wei Gao via ltp
2024-02-06 15:59 ` Petr Vorel
2025-10-22 2:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-12-18 13:21 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-12-24 8:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-01-05 12:53 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-06 6:26 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-01-06 8:39 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-06 8:39 ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-07 8:53 ` Jan Stancek via ltp
2026-01-07 6:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-02-18 12:21 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-05 4:41 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-17 7:43 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-17 9:54 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-17 11:46 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-20 12:54 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-27 18:17 ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-30 8:08 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-04 1:00 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-31 11:18 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7] fanotify22.c: handle multiple asynchronous error events Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-04 1:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7] io_submit04: Add test case for RWF_NOWAIT flag Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-08 15:11 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2026-04-09 2:26 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-09 8:03 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adZot378W4Rg-g4V@yuki.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox