public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v7] io_submit04: Add test case for RWF_NOWAIT flag
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:11:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adZot378W4Rg-g4V@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260404011340.13288-1-wegao@suse.com>

Hi!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_submit/io_submit04.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2025 Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * Test RWF_NOWAIT support in io_submit(), verifying that an
> + * asynchronous read operation on a blocking resource (empty pipe)
> + * will cause -EAGAIN. This is done by checking that io_getevents()
> + * :manpage:`io_getevents(2)` syscall returns immediately and
> + * io_event.res is equal to -EAGAIN.
> + */
> +
> +#include "config.h"
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
> +#include "lapi/aio_abi.h"
> +
> +#define BUF_SIZE 100
> +
> +static int fd[2] = {-1, -1};
> +static aio_context_t ctx;
> +static char *buf;
> +static iocb *cb;
> +static iocb **iocbs;
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	if (tst_syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx))
> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "io_setup failed");

Sorry if that was asked in previous reviews. Why are we using
tst_syscall() instead of the libaio functions like we do in the rest of
the tests?

> +	SAFE_PIPE(fd);
> +
> +	cb->aio_fildes = fd[0];
> +	cb->aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_PREAD;
> +	cb->aio_buf = TST_PTR_TO_UINT(buf);
> +	cb->aio_offset = 0;
> +	cb->aio_nbytes = BUF_SIZE;
> +	cb->aio_rw_flags = RWF_NOWAIT;
> +
> +	iocbs[0] = cb;
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	if (fd[0] != -1)
> +		SAFE_CLOSE(fd[0]);
> +
> +	if (fd[1] != -1)
> +		SAFE_CLOSE(fd[1]);
> +
> +	if (ctx && tst_syscall(__NR_io_destroy, ctx))
> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "io_destroy() failed");
> +}
> +
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> +	struct io_event evbuf;
> +	struct timespec timeout = { .tv_sec = 1 };
> +	long nr = 1;
> +
> +	TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, nr, iocbs));
> +
> +	if (TST_RET == -1 && TST_ERR == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "RWF_NOWAIT not supported by kernel");
> +	} else if (TST_RET != nr) {
> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "io_submit() returns %ld, expected %ld",
> +				TST_RET, nr);
> +	}
> +
> +	TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_io_getevents, ctx, 1, 1, &evbuf, &timeout));
> +
> +	if (TST_RET != 1) {
> +		tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "io_getevents() failed to get 1 event");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (evbuf.res == -EAGAIN)
> +		tst_res(TPASS, "io_getevents() returned EAGAIN on read event");
> +	else
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "io_getevents() returned with %s instead of EAGAIN",
> +			strerror(-evbuf.res));
                            ^
			    tst_strerrno()

Other than these two minor issues I do not see any problems in the code,
the rest looks fine.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-29  1:27 [LTP] [PATCH v1] io_submit04: Add test case for RWF_NOWAIT flag Wei Gao via ltp
2024-02-06 15:59 ` Petr Vorel
2025-10-22  2:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-12-18 13:21   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-12-24  8:49   ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-01-05 12:53     ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-06  6:26       ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-01-06  8:39         ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-06  8:39         ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-07  8:53           ` Jan Stancek via ltp
2026-01-07  6:10     ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-02-18 12:21       ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-05  4:41         ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-17  7:43       ` [LTP] [PATCH v5] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-17  9:54         ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-17 11:46         ` [LTP] [PATCH v6] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-20 12:54           ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-03-27 18:17           ` Petr Vorel
2026-03-30  8:08             ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-04  1:00             ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-03-31 11:18           ` [LTP] [PATCH v7] fanotify22.c: handle multiple asynchronous error events Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-04  1:13           ` [LTP] [PATCH v7] io_submit04: Add test case for RWF_NOWAIT flag Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-08 15:11             ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2026-04-09  2:26               ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-04-09  8:03                 ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adZot378W4Rg-g4V@yuki.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=wegao@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox