From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED8BCD3423 for ; Mon, 4 May 2026 08:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898B33E4822 for ; Mon, 4 May 2026 10:31:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284393E1869 for ; Mon, 4 May 2026 10:31:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9566002B8 for ; Mon, 4 May 2026 10:31:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D37F16AD86; Mon, 4 May 2026 08:31:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1777883481; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MlOWZ5/VRwy6YcjzXlVHOL2AKiC4GjaJCFOGRR4qUrQ=; b=n63H2mWETdo4f8AyhCtBPvibnPCEyDxwqHX/zCbEQO4mNBUXJgosZLR4iPgRYGMZKPMp1w 831YEJvCyygmxevABfeQz2o0j3TxIWw2jy9FEVnu/oRgbgXPf6E27rlycqvui3l7Jfhrts yvxG9sDZU5FbeGTCrRACoSh4E1PLGTs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777883481; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MlOWZ5/VRwy6YcjzXlVHOL2AKiC4GjaJCFOGRR4qUrQ=; b=/TMtVirXHIIyRm5tga3VlStD+aX+oEX3fDfq3BplYeWZYKq8RV6VWhu1sHXaVzUYL19JWN uB1a1gJ68BEdOIAw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="W/C7iqQP"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=+gYgbawx DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1777883480; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MlOWZ5/VRwy6YcjzXlVHOL2AKiC4GjaJCFOGRR4qUrQ=; b=W/C7iqQPKmYTdZ2BN+CSYpbrryzjxsRSOFrACfX5db7uYMi8uydiuoVVQCbf/F+cX/2JZe y3Q3b359abVNlf5i95bQ5Giwj4F9xmuMfnF9C7hpLor+xurHiIZr1GxZume3kuamV+cREi TwNdVj0ldyq7TTJZF9VtLgvToCcMGrQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1777883480; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MlOWZ5/VRwy6YcjzXlVHOL2AKiC4GjaJCFOGRR4qUrQ=; b=+gYgbawxd5elJtiRwVlHU5EOJEiZHp3DfrXsSPFg89EfQTHOn/1IiLTmAyAacBdfZASwTS YNFqO7R8sYuA+GDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15CB593A3; Mon, 4 May 2026 08:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 2QkHLlhZ+GlpZwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 04 May 2026 08:31:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 10:31:22 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Jinseok Kim Message-ID: References: <20260430150942.4859-1-always.starving0@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260430150942.4859-1-always.starving0@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from,2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D37F16AD86 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] testcases: unify naming for syscall tests ending in digits X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > I noticed both styles are used for tests of syscalls ending in digits: > > For example: > dup2/dup201.c > dup3/dup3_01.c > > Would it be better to unify them as dup2_01.c / dup3_01.c for consistency? It makes sense to unify, I'm not sure if it should be dup201.c and dup301.c or dup2_01.c and dup3_02.c. If we want to keep the naming consistent with the rest of LTP we should probably go for dup201.c and dup301.c but it's a bit less readable than the underscore variant. Does anyone else has an opinion here? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp