From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4AC060A2607 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=pSxdlO7E; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=539dz/bo; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=A6/Z+csB; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=WXAorfFM Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104383EA155 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:58:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FBE3E244E for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:57:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18682600733 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:57:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB6621E59; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:57:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1794304673; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CH5bkVTeQlkY4VEohaA3yL8XYf+gcvH3hYbrWA0A6Us=; b=pSxdlO7EViBA0+7iTVBxfB6lrsKGUeizPV+1LkYVLhmZorimms+l6mbKq79dPCPaN8Wh8a 3fZ5Bb9JR/qsC8vjxYiXgdXHThDH7m7xprEHN0To1XxrReRlBhEcb5S7QdXpAlXBwAUB8z qumlFr1Sy3Dvylc2GTMlsP8AR9FF86s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1794304673; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CH5bkVTeQlkY4VEohaA3yL8XYf+gcvH3hYbrWA0A6Us=; b=539dz/bo7sGAHWhdE7YeELUOqUiAgAoEYPOrzDHkloZ+GOKh0yH67uQ39z3lkyAPAUkIn+ AjsQ/mS+8Aw+hGBQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="A6/Z+csB"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=WXAorfFM DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1794304672; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CH5bkVTeQlkY4VEohaA3yL8XYf+gcvH3hYbrWA0A6Us=; b=A6/Z+csBCiJrK9UDRApu5ZPcqgxvz25fYp3+J/yvykkG8UMMqgfPfh9crY6tmfsJWHCl1i 5lfXTvbdt84dau+R7kMGm6bPpoe72YA5IvPEQPhDDYv75SZNC2qv/4EMG3pni+DkbsWnz4 sab7SKVhsw6hjQGhDMv8XCz3lI/Gv10= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1794304672; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CH5bkVTeQlkY4VEohaA3yL8XYf+gcvH3hYbrWA0A6Us=; b=WXAorfFMMUevfiXQA5MffMEeT316fOqbrD4KnQvyex6GCjGNn40e98N1SSguZdxK+YgtUj 4M/kqJDh7CZJ/YDA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4541339F; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id swTjM5/q8mplDAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:57:51 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:58:18 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20261026151638.578859-1-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261026151638.578859-1-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-13.51 / 50.00]; SUSE_INTERNAL_BYPASS(-9.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:email,suse.cz:dkim]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Score: -13.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2AB6621E59 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] shmctl03: Fix shmall clamped to UINT32_MAX in 32bit compat mode X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Unlike shmmax, the kernel's compat shmctl(IPC_INFO) path does not clamp > shmall but truncates the 64-bit value into the 32-bit compat shminfo > (see copy_compat_shminfo_to_user() in ipc/shm.c, originally changed by > af7c693f14606 ("Cap shmmax at INT_MAX in compat shminfo") in kernel > v2.6.22. Sigh, this does look very random, one value is truncated and one is saturated. I wonder if we should send a patch to kernel so that both values are saturated, that would make much more sense to me. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp