From: Joerg Vehlow <lkml@jv-coder.de>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] cgroup/cgroup_regression_test: Fix umount failure
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:36:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <caf1bb46-5212-3c3d-f180-e722ef2cf8dd@jv-coder.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210628033002.GA1469@andestech.com>
Hi,
On 6/28/2021 5:30 AM, Leo Liang wrote:
> From a151d48235629a125d5db57dd76c96fd951d5293 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:05:54 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cgroup/cgroup_regression_test: Fix umount failure
>
> The test sequence
> mount -t cgroup -o <controllers> <path>
> mkdir <path>/<dir>
> rmdir <path>/<dir>
> umount <path>
> mount -t cgroup -o <controllers> <path>
> would easily fail at the last mount with -EBUSY.
>
> The reason is that this test sequence have the chance of
> missing a release code path when doing rmdir and umount.
>
> Add sync between every "rmdir, umount" pair to fix the problem.
>
> Fixes: #839
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
> ---
> .../kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh
> index 1f7f3820e..9a00df101 100755
> --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh
> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ test2()
> fi
>
> rmdir cgroup/0 cgroup/1
> + sync
> umount cgroup/
> }
>
> @@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ test3()
> wait $pid2 2>/dev/null
>
> rmdir $cpu_subsys_path/0 2> /dev/null
> + sync
> umount cgroup/ 2> /dev/null
> check_kernel_bug
> }
> @@ -222,6 +224,7 @@ test4()
> mount -t cgroup -o none,name=foo cgroup cgroup/
> mkdir cgroup/0
> rmdir cgroup/0
> + sync
> umount cgroup/
>
> if dmesg | grep -q "MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low"; then
> @@ -254,6 +257,7 @@ test5()
> mount -t cgroup none cgroup 2> /dev/null
> mkdir cgroup/0
> rmdir cgroup/0
> + sync
> umount cgroup/ 2> /dev/null
> check_kernel_bug
> }
> @@ -290,6 +294,7 @@ test6()
>
> mount -t cgroup -o ns xxx cgroup/ > /dev/null 2>&1
> rmdir cgroup/[1-9]* > /dev/null 2>&1
> + sync
> umount cgroup/
> check_kernel_bug
> }
> @@ -324,6 +329,7 @@ test_7_1()
> mkdir $subsys_path/0
> sleep 100 < $subsys_path/0 & # add refcnt to this dir
> rmdir $subsys_path/0
> + sync
>
> # remount with new subsystems added
> # since 2.6.28, this remount will fail
> @@ -349,6 +355,7 @@ test_7_2()
> mkdir cgroup/0
> sleep 100 < cgroup/0 & # add refcnt to this dir
> rmdir cgroup/0
> + sync
>
> # remount with some subsystems removed
> # since 2.6.28, this remount will fail
I would like a short comment close to the syncs. When I converted
cpuset_regression_test.sh, I would have removed the sync in there, if
there wouldn't have been any comment.
Most of the time syncs are not required and just added by paranoid
developers, but if there is a real reason, I think it should be stated
in a comment.
J?rg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-28 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-28 3:30 [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] cgroup/cgroup_regression_test: Fix umount failure Leo Liang
2021-06-28 7:24 ` Richard Palethorpe
2021-06-28 7:36 ` Joerg Vehlow [this message]
2021-06-28 8:49 ` Petr Vorel
2021-06-28 13:08 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-07-06 3:27 ` Leo Liang
2021-07-06 5:45 ` xuyang2018.jy
2021-07-12 7:28 ` Leo Liang
2021-06-29 7:01 ` xuyang2018.jy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=caf1bb46-5212-3c3d-f180-e722ef2cf8dd@jv-coder.de \
--to=lkml@jv-coder.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox