From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A69C433FE for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9003CB0F9 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:12:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430BF3C010A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:12:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADE451A00CC4 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:12:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29J5C3AL012440; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : reply-to : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=k/s5iX0L4yafAjR+ynnmF0fpygAr16mGdXJ+VMTse48=; b=PR5H5ZyYttVnQLsmfBLRxEG23t/vdnEiz3l6FNxiQJ1vq/eCw9/rnpNJgmwQnrs8N4o8 XxGltCACE/Ylkazqh50AcxTwE9mslXKH7JZApGPsB+hCJYOZ3RBcAh6FwzHAdIrCW9gs QkCVNwIC+l9FSp6ddLIyJVI0CWtW3ebFBzya825edGrdwLB1/sWGaaZWa3pphtLLpbzD HMCAlXDElVZBOcYpibaNqgWQ7epJA82NBnLOhamngD3+uBPUTmg0rv7lXJxONEyDp98u jtokpvvIxuPSEW6a8F8+GbAsO2c7JH6BioAKbrzBLsZ/9ukpvgwqDkMIbxxDQDObgJ1d dQ== Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kaavhg04y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 29J56ulV001857; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:06 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3k7m4jpeyf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:06 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 29J5C3Ql29032724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:03 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F75AE051; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4EBAE045; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tarunpc (unknown [9.43.98.97]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:12:00 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: From: Tarun Sahu To: rpalethorpe@suse.de Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:41:59 +0530 In-Reply-To: <87wn8xi61v.fsf@suse.de> References: <20221016125731.249078-1-tsahu@linux.ibm.com> <87wn8xi61v.fsf@suse.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: b2FR_6tuaLLwfE425TBWBwqpC5gCi1a4 X-Proofpoint-GUID: b2FR_6tuaLLwfE425TBWBwqpC5gCi1a4 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-19_02,2022-10-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=773 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2210190027 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 00/29] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs tests X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: tsahu@linux.ibm.com Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, ltp@lists.linux.it, sbhat@linux.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Richard, Understood, I will repost the patch, with first 2/3 in the series. Thanks, On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 14:51 +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote: > Hello, > > Tarun Sahu writes: > > > Hi, > > Libhugetlbfs is not being maintained actively, and some distro is > > dropping > > support for it. There are some tests that are good for testing > > hugetlb > > functionality in kernel. > > > > As per previous dicussion in RFC[1], Here, this patch series > > consists > > of hugetlb tests taken from libhugetlbfs modified to work in ltp > > environment. This series do not include all the tests, I > > will post another series for the remaining tests soon. > > Perhaps Cyril already said this, but I suggest just getting one or > two > of the tests merged first then working through the rest. > > This reduces the iteration time and batch size. > > At least in terms of what you submit to the mailing list. Perhaps if > it > gets to the point where most tests pass review first time, you can > submit everything remaining. > > Also note that submitting this many new tests, once they are merged > we > will probably get failure reports (including compilation failures). > It > will make life easier to stagger that. > > I'm going to mark this patch-set as changes requested in patchwork. > -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp