From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLohE-0004Ql-S3 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:05:28 +0000 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1NLoh6-000541-JB for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:05:28 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:05:50 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?B?Smn47SBQYWxl6GVr?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200912041649.nB4GnQbj014719@e35.co.us.ibm.com> <1260186841.6866.20.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <364299f40912071042o50d0ac40le913ac35b6003dda@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <364299f40912071042o50d0ac40le913ac35b6003dda@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] New sigwaitinfo test List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Garrett Cooper , subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:42:13 +0100, Garrett Cooper = wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Subrata Modak > wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:46 +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> this is the test for the rt_sigtimedwait et al. functions I promised = >>> earlier. The code is unchanged since I sent it for the first time, but = >>> the Makefiles are adapted to the new build system, with the help of = >>> Garret Cooper. >>> >>> Regards >>> =A0 =A0 Jiri Palecek >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Palecek >> >> Thanks Jiri. Would you also take the trouble to make entries in the >> runtest/syscalls file for these tests to run ? > > Someone needs to verify whether or not the rt_* test is functional on > x86_64 as well, because these tests require additional setup for > x86_64; unfortunately my desktop is disconnected (and will remain so > for the next week while I move), so I can't verify this. Could you, please? IMHO there shouldn't be a problem with SA_RESTORER = (because the test doesn't use rt_sigaction), but there may be problems = with SIGSETSIZE. Jiri Palecek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev = _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list