From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Rob van der Heij <rvdheij@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
Subject: Re: [-stable 3.8.1 performance regression] madvise POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:58:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702135858.GA30837@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130625015648.GO29376@dastard>
* Dave Chinner (david@fromorbit.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:20:16AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Rob van der Heij (rvdheij@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Wouldn't you batch the calls to drop the pages from cache rather than drop
> > > one packet at a time?
> >
> > By default for kernel tracing, lttng's trace packets are 1MB, so I
> > consider the call to fadvise to be already batched by applying it to 1MB
> > packets rather than indivitual pages. Even there, it seems that the
> > extra overhead added by the lru drain on each CPU is noticeable.
> >
> > Another reason for not batching this in larger chunks is to limit the
> > impact of the tracer on the kernel page cache. LTTng limits itself to
> > its own set of buffers, and use the page cache for what is absolutely
> > needed to perform I/O, but no more.
>
> I think you are doing it wrong. This is a poster child case for
> using Direct IO and completely avoiding the page cache altogether....
I just tried replacing my sync_file_range()+fadvise() calls and instead
pass the O_DIRECT flag to open(). Unfortunately, I must be doing
something very wrong, because I get only 1/3rd of the throughput, and
the page cache fills up. Any idea why ?
Here are my results:
heavy-syscall.c: 30M sigaction() syscall with bad parameters (returns
immediately). Used as high-throughput stress-test for the tracer.
Tracing to disk with LTTng, all kernel tracepoints activated, including
system calls.
Tracer configuration: per-core buffers split into 4 sub-buffers of
262kB. splice() is used to transfer data from buffers to disk. Runs on a
8-core Intel machine.
Writing to a software raid-1 ext3 partition.
ext3 mount options: rw,errors=remount-ro
* sync_file_range+fadvise 3.9.8
- with lru drain on fadvise
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 56272k cached
After tracing: 56388k cached
939M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-090430
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m21.910s
throughput: 42MB/s
* sync_file_range+fadvise 3.9.8
- without lru drain on fadvise: manually reverted
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 67968k cached
After tracing: 67984k cached
945M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-092505
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m21.872s
throughput: 43MB/s
* O_DIRECT 3.9.8
- O_DIRECT flag on open(), removed fadvise and sync_file_range calls
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 99480k cached
After tracing: 360132k cached
258M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-090603
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m19.627s
throughput: 13MB/s
* No cache hints 3.9.8
- only removed fadvise and sync_file_range calls
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 103556k cached
After tracing: 363712k cached
945M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-092505
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m19.672s
throughput: 48MB/s
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51BE1828.3060206@gmail.com>
2013-06-17 14:13 ` [-stable 3.8.1 performance regression] madvise POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-06-17 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 21:39 ` Raphaël Beamonte
[not found] ` <CAE_Gge34HCroSgNgiXL1j7Le3CNKRXR=7TZQhJSmY+wfWniKug@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-17 21:57 ` [lttng-dev] " Andrew Morton
2013-06-18 2:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-06-18 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-18 9:29 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-18 10:11 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-19 19:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-06-20 6:36 ` Rob van der Heij
[not found] ` <CAJCc=kijujORhPUmPvzHj-MMdyVbf-iHEK0Jx-VHbTO8q4ESFA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-20 12:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-06-25 1:56 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-02 13:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2013-07-03 0:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-07-03 8:47 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:53 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-07-04 0:03 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-04 0:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-07-04 21:11 ` Rob van der Heij
2013-07-05 1:42 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-05 2:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-07-03 18:47 ` Yannick Brosseau
2013-07-05 14:18 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130702135858.GA30837@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rvdheij@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yannick.brosseau@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).