lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Introduce timekeeper latch synchronization
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:28:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52335935.1020307@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130913182020.GB32317@Krystal>

On 09/13/2013 11:20 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> This looks to me like interesting optimisation work that should be
> considered after the following question is answered: does the added
> update-side cost actually matter that much ?

Yea, fair enough. We can measure the cost first.

thanks
-john

      reply	other threads:[~2013-09-13 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-13  2:52 [RFC PATCH] Introduce timekeeper latch synchronization Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-09-13  7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-13 15:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-09-13 19:20   ` John Stultz
2013-09-14  1:18     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-09-13 16:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-13 17:05   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-09-13 17:41     ` John Stultz
2013-09-13 18:20       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-09-13 18:28         ` John Stultz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52335935.1020307@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).