From: "Yitschak, Yehuda via lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Mousa, Anas" <anasmous@amazon.com>,
"lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Profiling LTTng tracepoint latency on different arm platforms
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:21:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <618d035e059840d3a32b75633aa378f5@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb397173-040c-9370-c6c7-3c7b1535becb@efficios.com>
> On 6/21/23 01:39, Yitschak, Yehuda wrote:
> >> On 6/20/23 10:20, Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev wrote:
> >>> On 6/20/23 06:27, Mousa, Anas via lttng-dev wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> Arethereanysuggestionstorootcausethehighlatencyandpotentiallyimprovei
> >> to
> >> n*platform****1*?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks and best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Anas.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I recommend using "perf" when tracing with the sample program in a
> >>> loop to figure out the hot spots. With that information on the "fast"
> >>> and "slow" system, we might be able to figure out what differs.
> >>>
> >>> Also, comparing the kernel configurations of the two systems can help.
> >>> Also comparing the glibc versions of the two systems would be relevant.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Also make sure you benchmark the lttng "snapshot" mode [1] to make
> >> sure you don't run into a situation where the disk/network I/O
> >> throughput cannot cope with the generated event throughput, thus
> >> causing the ring buffer to discard events. This would therefore
> >> "speed up" tracing from the application perspective because
> >> discarding an event is faster than writing it to a ring buffer.
> >
> > You mean we should avoid the "discard" loss mode and use "overwrite"
> loss mode since discard mode can fake fast performance ?
>
> Yes. In addition to use "overwrite-when-buffer-full" mode, the "snapshot"
> session also ensures that no consumer daemon extracts the trace data
> (unless an explicit snapshot record is performed), which allows comparing
> the ring buffer producer performance with minimal noise.
>
> If you really want to benchmark the discard-when-buffer-full mode and the
> the consumer daemon I/O behavior, then you need to take into account
> event discarded counts and the actual trace data size that was written to
> disk.
Since you mentioned this, is there any "stat" command which lists events such as discards and disk writes, etc ?
I looked this up in the past but couldn't find anything
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Mathieu
> >>
> >> [1] https://lttng.org/docs/v2.13/#doc-taking-a-snapshot
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Mathieu
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mathieu Desnoyers
> >> EfficiOS Inc.
> >> https://www.efficios.com
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lttng-dev mailing list
> >> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> >> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> https://www.efficios.com
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-21 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-20 10:27 [lttng-dev] Profiling LTTng tracepoint latency on different arm platforms Mousa, Anas via lttng-dev
2023-06-20 14:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-06-20 18:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-06-21 5:39 ` Yitschak, Yehuda via lttng-dev
2023-06-21 13:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-06-21 14:21 ` Yitschak, Yehuda via lttng-dev [this message]
2023-09-10 14:18 ` Mousa, Anas via lttng-dev
2023-09-11 15:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-09-11 16:20 ` Michel Dagenais via lttng-dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=618d035e059840d3a32b75633aa378f5@amazon.com \
--to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=anasmous@amazon.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=yehuday@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).