From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: Bogus openembedded gcc patch Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <883932458.5623.1453895978760.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <1037243108.4336.1453770172960.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <51287CFC-6F3C-43B1-9190-84F3B20C192E@gmail.com> <433937130.5072.1453838389504.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2042106396==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openembedded-core-bounces-ZwoEplunGu3dfDuKDZ/zN51Ccm5ICvs9@public.gmane.org Errors-To: openembedded-core-bounces-ZwoEplunGu3dfDuKDZ/zN51Ccm5ICvs9@public.gmane.org To: "Burton, Ross" Cc: lttng-dev , openembedded-core List-Id: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org --===============2042106396== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5622_1195741865.1453895978758" ------=_Part_5622_1195741865.1453895978758 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.khem-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > wrote: >> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by >> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and >> > then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes >> > away when we do so, which points directly to that patch as a >> > culprit. >> > Test program is attached. >> Ok I think we can remove this from master and jethro release > Mathieu, as you found this do you want the glory by submitting a the removal > patch? Thanks for asking, but for me a Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers in the patch commit messge is good enough. You'll probably want to have a link to this discussion thread also in the commit message. Thanks, Mathieu > Cheerss, > Ross -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ------=_Part_5622_1195741865.1453895978758 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.c= om> wrote:

On 26 January 2016 at 23= :14, Khem Raj <raj.khem-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
&g= t; Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
> removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and
> then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes
> away when we do so, which points directly to that patch as a
> culprit.
>
> Test program is attached.

Ok I think we can remove this = from master and jethro release


Mathieu,= as you found this do you want the glory by submitting a the removal patch?=

Thanks for asking, but for me = a

Re= ported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

in the patc= h commit messge is good enough.
You'll p= robably want to have a link to this discussion thread
also in the commit message.

Thanks,

Mathieu
<= /div>


Cheerss,
Ros= s


--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://ww= w.efficios.com
------=_Part_5622_1195741865.1453895978758-- --===============2042106396== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core-ZwoEplunGu3dfDuKDZ/zN51Ccm5ICvs9@public.gmane.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core --===============2042106396==--