From: Eric Barton <eric.barton@oracle.com>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] Lustre RPC visualization
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 14:12:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <009101caf4f9$67e1dd50$37a597f0$@barton@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BEFBB07.4030403@tu-dresden.de>
Excellent :)
How do you think measurements taken from 1000 servers with 100,000
clients can be visualised? We've used heat maps to visualise
10s-100s of concurrent measurements (y) over time (x) but I wonder
if that will scale. Does vampire support heat maps?
Cheers,
Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kluge [mailto:Michael.Kluge at tu-dresden.de]
> Sent: 16 May 2010 10:30 AM
> To: di.wang
> Cc: Eric Barton; Andreas Dilger; Robert Read; Galen M. Shipman; lustre-devel
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-devel] Lustre RPC visualization
>
> Hi WangDi,
>
> the first version works. Screenshot is attached. I have a couple of
> counter realized: RPC's in flight and RPC's completed in total on the
> client, RPC's enqueued, RPC's in processing and RPC'c completed in total
> on the server. All these counter can be broken down by the type of RPC
> (op code). The picture has not yet the lines that show each single RPC,
> I still have to do counter like "avg. time to complete an RPC over the
> last second" and there are some more TODO's. Like the timer
> synchronization. (In the screenshot the first and the last counter show
> total values while the one in the middle shows a rate.)
>
> What I like to have is a complete set of traces from a small cluster
> (<100 nodes) including the servers. Would that be possible?
>
> Is one of you in Hamburg May, 31-June, 3 for ISC'2010? I'll be there and
> like to talk about what would be useful for the next steps.
>
>
> Regards, Michael
>
> Am 03.05.2010 21:52, schrieb di.wang:
> > Michael Kluge wrote:
> >>>> One more question: RPC 1334380768266400 (in the log WangDi sent me)
> >>>> has on the client side only a "Sending RPC" message, thus missing the
> >>>> "Completed RPC". The server has all three (received,start work, done
> >>>> work). Has this RPC vanished on the way back to the client? There is
> >>>> no further indication what happend. The last timestamp in the client
> >>>> log is:
> >>>> 1272565368.228628
> >>>> and the server says it finished the processing of the request at:
> >>>> 1272565281.379471
> >>>> So the client log has been recorded long enough to contain the
> >>>> "Completed RPC" message for this RPC if it arrived ever ...
> >>> Logically, yes. But in some cases, some debug logs might be abandoned
> >>> for some reasons(actually, it happens not rarely), and probably you need
> >>> maintain an average time from server "Handled RPC" to client "Completed
> >>> RPC", then you just guess the client "Completed RPC" time in this case.
> >>
> >> Oh my gosh ;) I don't want to start speculations about the helpfulness
> >> of incomplete debug logs. Anyway, what can get lost? Any kind of
> >> message on the servers and clients? I think I'd like to know what
> >> cases have to be handled while I try to track individual RPC's on
> >> their way.
> > Any records can get lost here. Unfortunately, there are not any messages
> > indicate the missing happened. :(
> > (Usually, I would check the time stamp in the log, i.e. no records for a
> > "long" time, for example several seconds, but this is not the accurate
> > way).
> >
> > I guess you can just ignore these uncompleted records in your first
> > step? Let's see how these incomplete log will
> > impact the profiling result, then we will decide how to deal with this?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Wangdi
> >>
> >> Regards, Michael
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Lustre-devel mailing list
> >> Lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
> >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Michael Kluge, M.Sc.
>
> Technische Universit?t Dresden
> Center for Information Services and
> High Performance Computing (ZIH)
> D-01062 Dresden
> Germany
>
> Contact:
> Willersbau, Room WIL A 208
> Phone: (+49) 351 463-34217
> Fax: (+49) 351 463-37773
> e-mail: michael.kluge at tu-dresden.de
> WWW: http://www.tu-dresden.de/zih
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-16 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <000c01cae6ee$1d4693d0$57d3bb70$@barton@oracle.com>
2010-04-29 1:25 ` [Lustre-devel] (no subject) di.wang
2010-04-29 1:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-04-29 2:04 ` di.wang
2010-04-29 4:48 ` [Lustre-devel] Lustre RPC visualization Michael Kluge
[not found] ` <4BD9CF75.8030204@oracle.com>
2010-05-03 8:41 ` Michael Kluge
2010-05-03 13:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-05-03 18:10 ` Michael Kluge
2010-05-03 18:57 ` Robert Read
2010-05-03 18:58 ` di.wang
2010-05-03 19:32 ` Michael Kluge
2010-05-03 19:52 ` di.wang
2010-05-03 20:04 ` Michael Kluge
2010-05-16 9:29 ` Michael Kluge
2010-05-16 13:12 ` Eric Barton [this message]
2010-05-17 4:52 ` Michael Kluge
2010-05-17 3:24 ` Andrew Uselton
2010-05-17 5:53 ` Michael Kluge
[not found] ` <009101caf4f9$67e1dd50$37a597f0$%barton@oracle.com>
2010-05-17 3:39 ` Shipman, Galen M.
2010-05-17 5:59 ` Michael Kluge
2010-05-25 12:03 ` Michael Kluge
[not found] ` <4BFC7177.9000808@oracle.com>
2010-05-28 14:54 ` Michael Kluge
[not found] ` <4BFFA456.7030502@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <C671351E-110C-4D2C-B216-4E8BE23A943A@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <1FF3D25F-3369-462E-9651-62D56319612A@tu-dresden.de>
[not found] ` <D29ED098-3DEB-4AF4-AA68-B52B4E2BF5EA@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <4C04F3F0.9040708@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <001601cb01a3$546c93d0$fd45bb70$%barton@oracle.com>
2010-06-01 12:12 ` di.wang
2010-06-01 17:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-01 19:39 ` Michael Kluge
2010-06-16 8:46 ` Michael Kluge
2010-06-16 14:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-17 14:02 ` Michael Kluge
[not found] ` <4169315E-9A94-4430-8970-92068222EF15@oracle.com>
2010-06-20 20:44 ` Michael Kluge
2010-06-22 15:12 ` Michael Kluge
2010-06-23 10:29 ` Alexey Lyashkov
2010-06-23 11:50 ` Michael Kluge
2010-06-23 12:09 ` Alexey Lyashkov
2010-06-23 12:38 ` Michael Kluge
2010-06-23 15:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-24 8:01 ` Michael Kluge
2010-06-01 15:58 ` Eric Barton
2010-09-22 13:46 ` Michael Kluge
2010-09-22 18:28 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='009101caf4f9$67e1dd50$37a597f0$@barton@oracle.com' \
--to=eric.barton@oracle.com \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox