From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 7/8] lustre: tests: testcases for multiple modify RPCs feature
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:44:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1564022647-17351-8-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564022647-17351-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
From: Gregoire Pichon <gregoire.pichon@bull.net>
This patch creates new testcases in the Auster test suite to
test the support of multiple modify RPCs in flight feature.
Two new OBD_FAIL codes are added to allow several failure occurences
of the reint requests or replies. This is needed because the current
fail checks impose the OBD_FAIL_ONCE flag.
Added testcases are :
- sanity 245
- conf-sanity 90a 90b 90c 90d
- replay-single 102a 102b 102c 102d
This patch also removes replay-single tests 53a and 53b
from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list.
WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5319
Lustre-commit: c2d27a0f12688c0d029880919f8b002e557b540c
Signed-off-by: Gregoire Pichon <gregoire.pichon@bull.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/14861
Reviewed-by: Jian Yu <yujian@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
---
fs/lustre/include/obd_support.h | 2 ++
fs/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/lustre/include/obd_support.h b/fs/lustre/include/obd_support.h
index 3e15cac..7999ac6 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/include/obd_support.h
+++ b/fs/lustre/include/obd_support.h
@@ -189,6 +189,8 @@
#define OBD_FAIL_MDS_SWAP_LAYOUTS_NET 0x14f
#define OBD_FAIL_MDS_HSM_ACTION_NET 0x150
#define OBD_FAIL_MDS_CHANGELOG_INIT 0x151
+#define OBD_FAIL_MDS_REINT_MULTI_NET 0x159
+#define OBD_FAIL_MDS_REINT_MULTI_NET_REP 0x15a
/* layout lock */
#define OBD_FAIL_MDS_NO_LL_GETATTR 0x170
diff --git a/fs/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c b/fs/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c
index 887507d..a3b8df4 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c
+++ b/fs/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c
@@ -689,6 +689,9 @@ int target_pack_pool_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
DEBUG_REQ(D_ERROR, req, "dropping reply");
return -ECOMM;
}
+ if (unlikely(lustre_msg_get_opc(req->rq_reqmsg) == MDS_REINT &&
+ OBD_FAIL_CHECK(OBD_FAIL_MDS_REINT_MULTI_NET_REP)))
+ return -ECOMM;
if (unlikely(rc)) {
DEBUG_REQ(D_NET, req, "processing error (%d)", rc);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 2:43 [lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/8] lustre: some old patches from whamcloud tree James Simmons
2019-07-25 2:44 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/8] lustre: seq: make seq_proc_write_common() safer James Simmons
2019-07-25 23:55 ` NeilBrown
2019-07-26 3:31 ` James Simmons
2019-07-25 2:44 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 2/8] lustre: ptlrpc: Fix an rq_no_reply assertion failure James Simmons
2019-08-14 16:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2019-07-25 2:44 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 3/8] lustre: fld: resend seq lookup RPC if it is on LWP James Simmons
2019-08-14 16:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2019-07-25 2:44 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 4/8] lustre: fld: retry fld rpc even for ESHUTDOWN James Simmons
2019-08-14 16:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2019-08-14 16:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2019-07-25 2:44 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 5/8] lustre: fld: retry fld rpc until the import is closed James Simmons
2019-08-14 16:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2019-07-25 2:44 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 6/8] lustre: fld: fld client lookup should retry James Simmons
2019-08-14 16:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2019-07-25 2:44 ` James Simmons [this message]
2019-08-14 16:58 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 7/8] lustre: tests: testcases for multiple modify RPCs feature Andreas Dilger
2019-07-25 2:44 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 8/8] lustre: ldlm: Don't check opcode with NULL rq_reqmsg James Simmons
2019-08-14 16:58 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1564022647-17351-8-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org \
--to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).