From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>,
Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 17/18] lustre: pcc: introducing OBD_CONNECT2_PCCRO flag
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:32:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1626697933-6971-18-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1626697933-6971-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
From: Qian Yingjin <qian@ddn.com>
Add a new connection flag OBD_CONNECT2_PCCRO to solve the access
consistency from the old client without PCC-RO support.
By necessity, also include definitions for OBD_CONNECT2_MODE_CONVERT
and OBD_CONNECT2_BATCH_RPC so obd_connect_names[] works.
WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10499
Lustre-commit: 6007dc9382df726 ("LU-10499 pcc: introducing OBD_CONNECT2_PCCRO flag")
Signed-off-by: Qian Yingjin <qian@ddn.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/40791
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@whamcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
---
fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c | 6 ++++++
include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c b/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
index c7eb218..cd1456c 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
+++ b/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
@@ -1252,6 +1252,12 @@ void lustre_assert_wire_constants(void)
OBD_CONNECT2_DOM_LVB);
LASSERTF(OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS == 0x100000ULL, "found 0x%.16llxULL\n",
OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS);
+ LASSERTF(OBD_CONNECT2_MODE_CONVERT == 0x200000ULL, "found 0x%.16llxULL\n",
+ OBD_CONNECT2_MODE_CONVERT);
+ LASSERTF(OBD_CONNECT2_BATCH_RPC == 0x400000ULL, "found 0x%.16llxULL\n",
+ OBD_CONNECT2_BATCH_RPC);
+ LASSERTF(OBD_CONNECT2_PCCRO == 0x800000ULL, "found 0x%.16llxULL\n",
+ OBD_CONNECT2_PCCRO);
LASSERTF(OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK == 0x4000000ULL, "found 0x%.16llxULL\n",
OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK);
LASSERTF(OBD_CKSUM_CRC32 == 0x00000001UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h b/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h
index 8f49adb..2047b92 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h
@@ -840,6 +840,10 @@ struct ptlrpc_body_v2 {
#define OBD_CONNECT2_LSEEK 0x40000ULL /* SEEK_HOLE/DATA RPC */
#define OBD_CONNECT2_DOM_LVB 0x80000ULL /* pack DOM glimpse data in LVB */
#define OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS 0x100000ULL /* match reply by mbits, not xid */
+#define OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS 0x100000ULL /* match reply mbits not xid*/
+#define OBD_CONNECT2_MODE_CONVERT 0x200000ULL /* LDLM mode convert */
+#define OBD_CONNECT2_BATCH_RPC 0x400000ULL /* Multi-RPC batch request */
+#define OBD_CONNECT2_PCCRO 0x800000ULL /* Read-only PCC */
#define OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK 0x4000000ULL/* request lock on 1st open */
/* XXX README XXX:
* Please DO NOT add flag values here before first ensuring that this same
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-19 12:31 [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/18] lustre: sync to OpenSFS as of July 18, 2021 James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:31 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/18] lustre: statahead: update task management code James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:31 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 02/18] lustre: llite: simplify callback handling for async getattr James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:31 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/18] lustre: uapi: per-user changelog names and mask James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:31 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 04/18] lnet: Correct peer NI recovery age out calculation James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/18] lustre: lmv: compare space to mkdir on parent MDT James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/18] lnet: annotate LNET_WIRE_HANDLE_COOKIE_NONE as u64 James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/18] lnet: libcfs: Add checksum speed under /sys/fs James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/18] lnet: use ni fatal error when calculating net health James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 09/18] lustre: quota: add get/set project support for non-dir/file James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/18] lustre: readahead: fix to reserve min pages James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/18] lnet: RMDA infrastructure updates James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 12/18] lnet: o2iblnd: Move racy NULL assignment James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 13/18] lnet: o2iblnd: Avoid double posting invalidate James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 14/18] lustre: quota: nodemap squashed root cannot bypass quota James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 15/18] lustre: llite: reset pfid after dir migration James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 16/18] lustre: llite: failed ASSERTION(ldlm_has_layout(lock)) James Simmons
2021-07-19 12:32 ` James Simmons [this message]
2021-07-19 12:32 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 18/18] lustre: sec: migrate/extend/split on encrypted file James Simmons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1626697933-6971-18-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org \
--to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=adilger@whamcloud.com \
--cc=green@whamcloud.com \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).