lustre-devel-lustre.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>,
	Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Lei Feng <flei@whamcloud.com>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 12/15] lustre: ptlrpc: remove LASSERT in nrs_polices debugfs handler
Date: Mon,  8 Nov 2021 10:07:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1636384063-13838-13-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1636384063-13838-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>

From: Lei Feng <flei@whamcloud.com>

It's not necessary to LASSERT() in nrs_polices debugfs handler.
CERROR() and returning error is good enough.

WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14587
Lustre-commit: 9997f94d4b6ee335d ("LU-14587 ptlrpc: remove LASSERT in nrs_polices proc handler")
Signed-off-by: Lei Feng <flei@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/45200
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Xi <lixi@ddn.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
---
 fs/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c b/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c
index 0323291..b2daf1f 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c
+++ b/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c
@@ -570,6 +570,8 @@ static int ptlrpc_lprocfs_nrs_policies_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *n)
 			if (i == 0) {
 				memcpy(infos[pol_idx].pi_name, tmp.pi_name,
 				       NRS_POL_NAME_MAX);
+				memcpy(infos[pol_idx].pi_arg, tmp.pi_arg,
+				       sizeof(tmp.pi_arg));
 				memcpy(&infos[pol_idx].pi_state, &tmp.pi_state,
 				       sizeof(tmp.pi_state));
 				infos[pol_idx].pi_fallback = tmp.pi_fallback;
@@ -578,17 +580,39 @@ static int ptlrpc_lprocfs_nrs_policies_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *n)
 				 * sanity-check the values we get.
 				 */
 			} else {
-				LASSERT(strncmp(infos[pol_idx].pi_name,
-						tmp.pi_name,
-						NRS_POL_NAME_MAX) == 0);
+				if (strncmp(infos[pol_idx].pi_name,
+					    tmp.pi_name,
+					    NRS_POL_NAME_MAX) != 0) {
+					spin_unlock(&nrs->nrs_lock);
+					rc = -EINVAL;
+					CERROR("%s: failed to check pi_name: rc = %d\n",
+					       svc->srv_thread_name, rc);
+					goto unlock;
+				}
+				if (strncmp(infos[pol_idx].pi_arg,
+					    tmp.pi_arg,
+					    sizeof(tmp.pi_arg)) != 0) {
+					spin_unlock(&nrs->nrs_lock);
+					rc = -EINVAL;
+					CERROR("%s: failed to check pi_arg: rc = %d\n",
+					       svc->srv_thread_name, rc);
+					goto unlock;
+				}
 				/**
-				 * Not asserting ptlrpc_nrs_pol_info::pi_state,
+				 * Not checking ptlrpc_nrs_pol_info::pi_state,
 				 * because it may be different between
 				 * instances of the same policy in different
 				 * service partitions.
 				 */
-				LASSERT(infos[pol_idx].pi_fallback ==
-					tmp.pi_fallback);
+
+				if (infos[pol_idx].pi_fallback !=
+				    tmp.pi_fallback) {
+					spin_unlock(&nrs->nrs_lock);
+					rc = -EINVAL;
+					CERROR("%s: failed to check pi_fallback: rc = %d\n",
+					       svc->srv_thread_name, rc);
+					goto unlock;
+				}
 			}
 
 			infos[pol_idx].pi_req_queued += tmp.pi_req_queued;
@@ -633,12 +657,18 @@ static int ptlrpc_lprocfs_nrs_policies_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *n)
 		   !hp ?  "\nregular_requests:" : "high_priority_requests:");
 
 	for (pol_idx = 0; pol_idx < num_pols; pol_idx++) {
-		seq_printf(m,  "  - name: %s\n"
-			       "    state: %s\n"
+		if (strlen(infos[pol_idx].pi_arg) > 0)
+			seq_printf(m, "  - name: %s %s\n",
+				   infos[pol_idx].pi_name,
+				   infos[pol_idx].pi_arg);
+		else
+			seq_printf(m, "  - name: %s\n",
+				   infos[pol_idx].pi_name);
+
+		seq_printf(m,  "    state: %s\n"
 			       "    fallback: %s\n"
 			       "    queued: %-20d\n"
 			       "    active: %-20d\n\n",
-			       infos[pol_idx].pi_name,
 			       nrs_state2str(infos[pol_idx].pi_state),
 			       infos[pol_idx].pi_fallback ? "yes" : "no",
 			       (int)infos[pol_idx].pi_req_queued,
@@ -655,8 +685,9 @@ static int ptlrpc_lprocfs_nrs_policies_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *n)
 		goto again;
 	}
 
-	kfree(infos);
 unlock:
+	kfree(infos);
+
 	mutex_unlock(&nrs_core.nrs_mutex);
 
 	return rc;
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-08 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-08 15:07 [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/15] lustre: update to OpenSFS tree Nov 8, 2021 James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/15] lustre: sec: keep encryption context in xattr cache James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 02/15] lustre: mdc: add support for grant shrink James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/15] lnet: Fix reference leak in lnet_parse James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 04/15] lnet: socklnd: lock ksnc_tx_queue list processing James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/15] lustre: ptlrpc: align function names with param names James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/15] lnet: don't retry allocating router buffers James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/15] lustre: ptlrpc: recalc timer on EINPROGRESS reply James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/15] lustre: obdclass: add start time to stats files James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 09/15] lustre: dne: dir migrate in QOS mode James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/15] lustre: lov: fix error handling in lov_new_pool James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/15] lustre: vfs: set_nlink() is not race-safe James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` James Simmons [this message]
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 13/15] lnet: socklnd: default conns_per_peer to 0 James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 14/15] lnet: don't use hops to determine the route state James Simmons
2021-11-08 15:07 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 15/15] lustre: lmv: update default LMV upon any change James Simmons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1636384063-13838-13-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=adilger@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=flei@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=green@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).