lustre-devel-lustre.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>,
	Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Amir Shehata <ashehata@whamcloud.com>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 27/40] lnet: Lock primary NID logic
Date: Sun,  9 Apr 2023 08:13:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1681042400-15491-28-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1681042400-15491-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>

From: Amir Shehata <ashehata@whamcloud.com>

If a peer is created by Lustre make sure to lock that peer's
primary NID. This peer can be discovered in the background.
There is no need to block until discovery is complete, as Lustre
can continue on with the primary NID it provided.

Discovery will populate the peer with other interfaces the peer has
but will not change the peer's primary NID. It can also delete
peer's NIDs which Lustre told it about (not the Primary NID).

If a peer has been manually discovered via
   lnetctl discover <nid>
command, then make sure to delete the manually discovered
 peer and recreate it with the Lustre NID information
provided for us.

WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14668
Lustre-commit: aacb16191a72bc6db ("LU-14668 lnet: Lock primary NID logic")
Signed-off-by: Amir Shehata <ashehata@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/50106
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bordage <cbordage@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Sehr <fsehr@whamcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
---
 net/lnet/lnet/peer.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c b/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c
index da1f8d4..0539cb4 100644
--- a/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c
+++ b/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c
@@ -534,6 +534,15 @@ static void lnet_peer_cancel_discovery(struct lnet_peer *lp)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* If we're asked to lock down the primary NID we shouldn't be
+	 * deleting it
+	 */
+	if (lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY &&
+	    nid_same(&primary_nid, nid)) {
+		rc = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	lpni = lnet_peer_ni_find_locked(nid);
 	if (!lpni) {
 		rc = -ENOENT;
@@ -1358,6 +1367,19 @@ struct lnet_peer_ni *
 		if (LNET_NID_IS_ANY(&pnid)) {
 			lnet_nid4_to_nid(nids[i], &pnid);
 			rc = lnet_add_peer_ni(&pnid, &LNET_ANY_NID, mr, true);
+			if (rc == -EALREADY) {
+				struct lnet_peer *lp;
+
+				CDEBUG(D_NET, "A peer exists for NID %s\n",
+				       libcfs_nidstr(&pnid));
+				rc = 0;
+				/* Adds a refcount */
+				lp = lnet_find_peer(&pnid);
+				LASSERT(lp);
+				pnid = lp->lp_primary_nid;
+				/* Drop refcount from lookup */
+				lnet_peer_decref_locked(lp);
+			}
 		} else if (lnet_peer_discovery_disabled) {
 			lnet_nid4_to_nid(nids[i], &nid);
 			rc = lnet_add_peer_ni(&nid, &LNET_ANY_NID, mr, true);
@@ -1405,13 +1427,20 @@ void LNetPrimaryNID(struct lnet_nid *nid)
 	 * down then this discovery can introduce long delays into the mount
 	 * process, so skip it if it isn't necessary.
 	 */
-	while (!lnet_peer_discovery_disabled && !lnet_peer_is_uptodate(lp)) {
-		spin_lock(&lp->lp_lock);
+	spin_lock(&lp->lp_lock);
+	if (!lnet_peer_discovery_disabled &&
+	    (!(lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY) ||
+	     !lnet_peer_is_uptodate_locked(lp))) {
 		/* force a full discovery cycle */
-		lp->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_FORCE_PING | LNET_PEER_FORCE_PUSH;
+		lp->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_FORCE_PING | LNET_PEER_FORCE_PUSH |
+				LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY;
 		spin_unlock(&lp->lp_lock);
 
-		rc = lnet_discover_peer_locked(lpni, cpt, true);
+		/* start discovery in the background. Messages to that
+		 * peer will not go through until the discovery is
+		 * complete
+		 */
+		rc = lnet_discover_peer_locked(lpni, cpt, false);
 		if (rc)
 			goto out_decref;
 		/* The lpni (or lp) for this NID may have changed and our ref is
@@ -1425,14 +1454,8 @@ void LNetPrimaryNID(struct lnet_nid *nid)
 			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 		lp = lpni->lpni_peer_net->lpn_peer;
-
-		/* If we find that the peer has discovery disabled then we will
-		 * not modify whatever primary NID is currently set for this
-		 * peer. Thus, we can break out of this loop even if the peer
-		 * is not fully up to date.
-		 */
-		if (lnet_is_discovery_disabled(lp))
-			break;
+	} else {
+		spin_unlock(&lp->lp_lock);
 	}
 	*nid = lp->lp_primary_nid;
 out_decref:
@@ -1538,6 +1561,8 @@ struct lnet_peer_net *
 			lnet_peer_clr_non_mr_pref_nids(lp);
 		}
 	}
+	if (flags & LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY)
+		lp->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY;
 	spin_unlock(&lp->lp_lock);
 
 	lp->lp_nnis++;
@@ -1599,13 +1624,28 @@ struct lnet_peer_net *
 			else if ((lp->lp_state ^ flags) & LNET_PEER_MULTI_RAIL)
 				rc = -EPERM;
 			goto out;
-		} else if (!(flags & LNET_PEER_CONFIGURED)) {
+		} else if (lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY) {
 			if (nid_same(&lp->lp_primary_nid, nid)) {
 				rc = -EEXIST;
 				goto out;
 			}
+			/* we're trying to recreate an existing peer which
+			 * has already been created and its primary
+			 * locked. This is likely due to two servers
+			 * existing on the same node. So we'll just refer
+			 * to that node with the primary NID which was
+			 * first added by Lustre
+			 */
+			rc = -EALREADY;
+			goto out;
 		}
-		/* Delete and recreate as a configured peer. */
+		/* Delete and recreate the peer.
+		 * We can get here:
+		 * 1. If the peer is being recreated as a configured NID
+		 * 2. if there already exists a peer which
+		 *    was discovered manually, but is recreated via Lustre
+		 *    with PRIMARY_lock
+		 */
 		rc = lnet_peer_del(lp);
 		if (rc)
 			goto out;
@@ -1695,19 +1735,36 @@ struct lnet_peer_net *
 		}
 		/* If this is the primary NID, destroy the peer. */
 		if (lnet_peer_ni_is_primary(lpni)) {
-			struct lnet_peer *rtr_lp =
+			struct lnet_peer *lp2 =
 				lpni->lpni_peer_net->lpn_peer;
-			int rtr_refcount = rtr_lp->lp_rtr_refcount;
-
+			int rtr_refcount = lp2->lp_rtr_refcount;
+
+			/* If the new peer that this NID belongs to is
+			 * a primary NID for another peer which we're
+			 * suppose to preserve the Primary for then we
+			 * don't want to mess with it. But the
+			 * configuration is wrong at this point, so we
+			 * should flag both of these peers as in a bad
+			 * state
+			 */
+			if (lp2->lp_state & LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY) {
+				spin_lock(&lp->lp_lock);
+				lp->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_BAD_CONFIG;
+				spin_unlock(&lp->lp_lock);
+				spin_lock(&lp2->lp_lock);
+				lp2->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_BAD_CONFIG;
+				spin_unlock(&lp2->lp_lock);
+				goto out_free_lpni;
+			}
 			/* if we're trying to delete a router it means
 			 * we're moving this peer NI to a new peer so must
 			 * transfer router properties to the new peer
 			 */
 			if (rtr_refcount > 0) {
 				flags |= LNET_PEER_RTR_NI_FORCE_DEL;
-				lnet_rtr_transfer_to_peer(rtr_lp, lp);
+				lnet_rtr_transfer_to_peer(lp2, lp);
 			}
-			lnet_peer_del(lpni->lpni_peer_net->lpn_peer);
+			lnet_peer_del(lp2);
 			lnet_peer_ni_decref_locked(lpni);
 			lpni = lnet_peer_ni_alloc(nid);
 			if (!lpni) {
@@ -1765,7 +1822,8 @@ struct lnet_peer_net *
 	if (nid_same(&lp->lp_primary_nid, nid))
 		goto out;
 
-	lp->lp_primary_nid = *nid;
+	if (!(lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY))
+		lp->lp_primary_nid = *nid;
 
 	rc = lnet_peer_add_nid(lp, nid, flags);
 	if (rc) {
@@ -1773,6 +1831,14 @@ struct lnet_peer_net *
 		goto out;
 	}
 out:
+	/* if this is a configured peer or the primary for that peer has
+	 * been locked, then we don't want to flag this scenario as
+	 * a failure
+	 */
+	if (lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_CONFIGURED ||
+	    lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_LOCK_PRIMARY)
+		return 0;
+
 	CDEBUG(D_NET, "peer %s NID %s: %d\n",
 	       libcfs_nidstr(&old), libcfs_nidstr(nid), rc);
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-09 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-09 12:12 [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/40] lustre: backport OpenSFS changes from March XX, 2023 James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/40] lustre: protocol: basic batching processing framework James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 02/40] lustre: lov: fiemap improperly handles fm_extent_count=0 James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/40] lustre: llite: SIGBUS is possible on a race with page reclaim James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 04/40] lustre: osc: page fault in osc_release_bounce_pages() James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/40] lustre: readahead: add stats for read-ahead page count James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/40] lustre: quota: enforce project quota for root James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/40] lustre: ldlm: send the cancel RPC asap James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/40] lustre: enc: align Base64 encoding with RFC 4648 base64url James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 09/40] lustre: quota: fix insane grant quota James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/40] lustre: llite: check truncated page in ->readpage() James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/40] lnet: o2iblnd: Fix key mismatch issue James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 12/40] lustre: sec: fid2path for encrypted files James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 13/40] lustre: sec: Lustre/HSM on enc file with enc key James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 14/40] lustre: llite: check read page past requested James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 15/40] lustre: llite: fix relatime support James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 16/40] lustre: ptlrpc: clarify AT error message James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 17/40] lustre: update version to 2.15.54 James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 18/40] lustre: tgt: skip free inodes in OST weights James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:12 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/40] lustre: fileset: check fileset for operations by fid James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 20/40] lustre: clio: Remove cl_page_size() James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 21/40] lustre: fid: clean up OBIF_MAX_OID and IDIF_MAX_OID James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 22/40] lustre: llog: fix processing of a wrapped catalog James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 23/40] lustre: llite: replace lld_nfs_dentry flag with opencache handling James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 24/40] lustre: llite: match lock in corresponding namespace James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 25/40] lnet: libcfs: remove unused hash code James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 26/40] lustre: client: -o network needs add_conn processing James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` James Simmons [this message]
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 28/40] lnet: Peers added via kernel API should be permanent James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 29/40] lnet: don't delete peer created by Lustre James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 30/40] lnet: memory leak in copy_ioc_udsp_descr James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 31/40] lnet: remove crash with UDSP James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 32/40] lustre: ptlrpc: fix clang build errors James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 33/40] lustre: ldlm: remove client_import_find_conn() James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 34/40] lnet: add 'force' option to lnetctl peer del James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 35/40] lustre: ldlm: BL_AST lock cancel still can be batched James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 36/40] lnet: lnet_parse_route uses wrong loop var James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 37/40] lustre: tgt: add qos debug James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 38/40] lustre: enc: file names encryption when using secure boot James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 39/40] lustre: uapi: add DMV_IMP_INHERIT connect flag James Simmons
2023-04-09 12:13 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 40/40] lustre: llite: dir layout inheritance fixes James Simmons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1681042400-15491-28-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=adilger@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=ashehata@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=green@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).