Lustre-devel archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Zhuravlev <Alex.Zhuravlev@Sun.COM>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] global epochs [an alternative proposal, long and dry].
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:45:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494FA825.4080406@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18767.41574.948255.718042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

Nikita Danilov wrote:
> All in all, I have a feeling that _all_ such algorithms have similar
> communication overhead for the `usual' workload.

not sure what you meant by "such" and "usual", but dependency-based
recovery may have zero overhead for "usual local" workload, in terms
of network and disk traffic.

thanks, Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-22 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-22  7:53 [Lustre-devel] global epochs [an alternative proposal, long and dry] Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 11:52 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-22 12:45   ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 13:48     ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2008-12-22 14:21       ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 14:45         ` Alex Zhuravlev [this message]
2008-12-22 14:44     ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-22 17:15       ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 17:36         ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-22 18:57           ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23  6:44             ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 10:00               ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23 10:21                 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 11:06                   ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23 11:31                     ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 12:50                       ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23 13:11                         ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 13:24                           ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-24 10:32                         ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-24 11:37                           ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-26  9:01                             ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 23:37             ` Andreas Dilger
2008-12-24 12:35               ` Eric Barton
2008-12-24 16:16               ` Nikita Danilov
2009-01-15 23:40 ` [Lustre-devel] global epochs vs fsync Alex Zhuravlev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=494FA825.4080406@sun.com \
    --to=alex.zhuravlev@sun.com \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox